A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Gliders and Transponders......again.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 24th 09, 08:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Gliders and Transponders......again.

On Jan 24, 10:00*am, Jim White wrote:
At 04:08 24 January 2009, Eric Greenwell wrote:

I'm also skeptical of the "in the pipeline" claim, unless that means
"I've heard of some stuff that could do the job but it's not even on
it's way *to certification because there aren't even any specifications
for it yet".


Why is progress always seen as impossible?

http://www.mitre.org/work/tech_paper...34/07_0634.pdf

Jim


Why? Because in the USA there is huge existing infrastructure
including SSR, TCAS-II equipped aircraft and even down to PCAS that
UAT's sort of turns on its head. Then more recently there is
competition for data services from XM weather, Iridium, etc. and
security/hacking concerns with UATs (want to shut down huge parts of
some airspace with a transmitter and a laptop spoofing aircraft all
over the place? - supposedly one reason some of the Australian
adoption slowed down.). Then there is regulation/bureaucracy that has
to catch up with possible technology changes. While ADS-B promises a
lot people keep blurring the ADS-B-out capabilities like the Mitre low-
end prototype UAT and all the things like ADS-B-in with TIS-B/FIS-B
etc. that it cannot do.

Meanwhile Mode-S transponder technology with 1090ES for ADS-B keeps
getting smaller, less power consumption, etc. With Europe taking the
lead (ironically by largely dragging their feet on anything besides
1090ES). I'd expect to see continuing competition in the 1090ES space.
Like the impressive looking Trig TT21 transponder. I fly with a Mode-C
now, which does me fine. UATs have no appeal to me for the foreseeable
future for where I fly in high traffic areas, and if I had to I'd
rather pay $2,000 or so for a Mode-S 1090ES unit that is fully
compatible with existing infrastructure than $500 or $1,000 (at a
guess) for something that is not (and has anybody seen pricing yet on
an ADS-B UAT?). In future UATs hold some advantages, including better
uplink data, better coverage, etc. but I would not hold my breath that
early or low-cost units will offer anything above what you can do with
1090ES. Building a box is relatively easy, changing infrastructure is
not.


Darryl
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios Larry Dighera Piloting 155 May 10th 08 02:45 PM
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios Larry Dighera Soaring 12 May 1st 08 03:42 PM
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios Alan[_6_] Soaring 3 May 1st 08 03:30 PM
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios Larry Dighera Soaring 0 April 28th 08 04:22 AM
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs Greg Arnold Soaring 2 May 26th 06 05:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.