![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 24, 10:00*am, Jim White wrote:
At 04:08 24 January 2009, Eric Greenwell wrote: I'm also skeptical of the "in the pipeline" claim, unless that means "I've heard of some stuff that could do the job but it's not even on it's way *to certification because there aren't even any specifications for it yet". Why is progress always seen as impossible? http://www.mitre.org/work/tech_paper...34/07_0634.pdf Jim Why? Because in the USA there is huge existing infrastructure including SSR, TCAS-II equipped aircraft and even down to PCAS that UAT's sort of turns on its head. Then more recently there is competition for data services from XM weather, Iridium, etc. and security/hacking concerns with UATs (want to shut down huge parts of some airspace with a transmitter and a laptop spoofing aircraft all over the place? - supposedly one reason some of the Australian adoption slowed down.). Then there is regulation/bureaucracy that has to catch up with possible technology changes. While ADS-B promises a lot people keep blurring the ADS-B-out capabilities like the Mitre low- end prototype UAT and all the things like ADS-B-in with TIS-B/FIS-B etc. that it cannot do. Meanwhile Mode-S transponder technology with 1090ES for ADS-B keeps getting smaller, less power consumption, etc. With Europe taking the lead (ironically by largely dragging their feet on anything besides 1090ES). I'd expect to see continuing competition in the 1090ES space. Like the impressive looking Trig TT21 transponder. I fly with a Mode-C now, which does me fine. UATs have no appeal to me for the foreseeable future for where I fly in high traffic areas, and if I had to I'd rather pay $2,000 or so for a Mode-S 1090ES unit that is fully compatible with existing infrastructure than $500 or $1,000 (at a guess) for something that is not (and has anybody seen pricing yet on an ADS-B UAT?). In future UATs hold some advantages, including better uplink data, better coverage, etc. but I would not hold my breath that early or low-cost units will offer anything above what you can do with 1090ES. Building a box is relatively easy, changing infrastructure is not. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 155 | May 10th 08 02:45 PM |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 12 | May 1st 08 03:42 PM |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Alan[_6_] | Soaring | 3 | May 1st 08 03:30 PM |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 0 | April 28th 08 04:22 AM |
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 2 | May 26th 06 05:13 PM |