![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 1:22�pm, Brian Whatcott wrote:
cmyr wrote: � � �In my effort to learn/remember/practice correct building procedures,I monitor several wood aircraft design sights. In the emerauders group,much discussion about using a wingspar that was built and purchased by another builder. The Emeraud spar consists of 2 laminated built ip beams,w ply intercoastals, and boxed front and rear w/ply. The spar in question was made with vertical grain wood, and laminated with the grain �perpendicular relative to the wing chord, I believe the spar caps and laminations should have grain approx. parallel to the wing chord. If anyone has a definitive answer that may even prevent an accident go yo yahoo groups,emerauders If you are referring to the laminated caps of a box beam on top and bottom: I have seen this discussion at various stages of heat, several times before. The usual conclusion is that if the tree trunk is oriented along the axis that runs from wingtip to wing tip, it's not terribly important whether a cross section of the box beam shows vertical grain in the caps or horizontal. the horizontal grain orientastion is slightly prefered if I recall. I understand that even well seasoned timber can show some progressive straightening of curved grain in the cross section, so having any curve the same in adjacent lamina might be an idea. Not strictly relevant: an aluminum spar designer decided to add aluminum strips progressively in the WEB plane near top and bottom rather than on the top and bottom faces of the I beam he used, for the sake of convenience, at the cost of some loss of strength in bending. � This was a light single for homebuilding from a couple folks at Loughborough Tech Aero Dept. as I recall. Brian W As I recall , the horizontal grain orientation is preferred because the adhesive has access to every layer of the wood in the 2 sparcaps when joined to the front/rear ply webs. With vertical oriented caps, only the front/rear wood layers would carry all the loads to the ply webs when assembled. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAS: Laminating an Aileron Spar NOW: how much wood should I leave at narrowist point? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 1 | April 12th 07 02:03 AM |
CAP Orientation Pilot? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 7 | August 3rd 05 02:22 AM |
wood grain question. | Fred the Red Shirt | Home Built | 1 | December 6th 04 02:13 PM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Piloting | 533 | June 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Instrument Flight Rules | 317 | June 21st 04 06:10 PM |