A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Wood grain orientation in a built-up spar



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old June 25th 09, 09:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
cmyr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Wood grain orientation in a built-up spar

On Jun 25, 1:22�pm, Brian Whatcott wrote:
cmyr wrote:
� � �In my effort to learn/remember/practice correct building
procedures,I monitor several wood aircraft design sights. In the
emerauders group,much discussion about using a wingspar that was built
and purchased by another builder. The Emeraud spar consists of 2
laminated built ip beams,w ply intercoastals, and boxed front and rear
w/ply. The spar in question was made with vertical grain wood, and
laminated with the grain �perpendicular relative to the wing chord, I
believe the spar caps and laminations should have grain approx.
parallel to the wing chord. If anyone has a definitive answer that may
even prevent an accident go yo yahoo groups,emerauders


If you are referring to the laminated caps of a box beam on top and
bottom: I have seen this discussion at various stages of heat, several
times before.
The usual conclusion is that if the tree trunk is oriented along the
axis that runs from wingtip to wing tip, it's not terribly important
whether a cross section of the box beam shows vertical grain in the caps
or horizontal. the horizontal grain orientastion is slightly prefered if
I recall. I understand that even well seasoned timber can show some
progressive straightening of curved grain in the cross section, so
having any curve the same in adjacent lamina might be an idea.

Not strictly relevant: an aluminum spar designer decided to add aluminum
strips progressively in the WEB plane near top and bottom rather than on
the top and bottom faces of the I beam he used, for the sake of
convenience, at the cost of some loss of strength in bending.
� This was a light single for homebuilding from a couple folks at
Loughborough Tech Aero Dept. as I recall.

Brian W


As I recall , the horizontal grain orientation is preferred because
the adhesive has access to every layer of the wood in the 2 sparcaps
when joined to the front/rear ply webs. With vertical oriented caps,
only the front/rear wood layers would carry all the loads to the ply
webs when assembled.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WAS: Laminating an Aileron Spar NOW: how much wood should I leave at narrowist point? Michael Horowitz Home Built 1 April 12th 07 02:03 AM
CAP Orientation Pilot? Robert M. Gary Piloting 7 August 3rd 05 02:22 AM
wood grain question. Fred the Red Shirt Home Built 1 December 6th 04 02:13 PM
Pilot's Political Orientation Chicken Bone Piloting 533 June 29th 04 12:47 AM
Pilot's Political Orientation Chicken Bone Instrument Flight Rules 317 June 21st 04 06:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.