A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Vne, Va and lift?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old September 14th 09, 01:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Vne, Val and lift?

In article ,
Robert Moore wrote:

Orval Fairbairn wrote
In the case of the firefighting plane, if it was flying level and
dropped a large weight (slurry), the wings would have the same load,
either with or without the dropped weight. Other airframe components,
such as engine mounts, fixed equipment, crew, however, would
experience a sudden increase in G loading. If the plane was flying at
too high speed, sudden updrafts/gusts could overload the wings.


Say What!!

You may know what you are trying to say, but it sure didn't come out
making sense.

From Wikipedia:
The g-force experienced by an object is its acceleration relative to
free-fall. The term g-force is considered a misnomer, as g-force is not
a force but an acceleration.

You probably meant to say "wings would have the same LOAD FACTOR".
Clearly, the load supported by the wing of a loaded aircraft is more
than the wing loading of an empty aircraft even though both are
experiencing only 1g. If the pilot doesn't reduce the angle of attack
(amount of lift produced by the wing)as the load is dropped, the wing
root will experience an increase in g-force. G-force is equal to the
actual lift being produced by the wing (at that angle of attack and
airspeed) divided by the weight being lifted.

From a aerodynamic viewpoint, the smart thing to do would be to push-
over (reduce the angle of attack) just as the fire retardant is
released, thereby reducing the g-force on the wing root. This, however,
tends to prevent the retardant from exiting the aircraft. What the
pilots seem to be doing is pulling up AND turning at the point of drop
and thereby making a bad situation even worse.

Bob Moore


It is a paradox here.

Structurally, a wing really doesn't care WHAT the G-force is! All the
structure is concerned about is the amount of stress on its components.
A wing carrying, say 200K#, which suddenly drops 100K# will pull 2G, but
the STRESS on the wings remains 200K#. Other components of the aircraft
will experience 2G, but the wing's stresses remain the same.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much lift do you need? Dan Luke Piloting 3 April 16th 07 02:46 PM
Come lift a cup with Joe Rasymas! Fred Soaring 5 October 24th 06 08:42 PM
Theories of lift Avril Poisson General Aviation 3 April 28th 06 07:20 AM
what the heck is lift? buttman Piloting 72 September 16th 05 11:50 PM
thermal lift ekantian Soaring 0 October 5th 04 02:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.