![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Evan,
Your feedback is so different from all other Cambridge 302 user feedback I've received that it makes me wonder whether your 302 is out of calibration in some way. Does it show accurate airspeed while in flight? Best Regards, Paul Remde "T8" wrote in message ... Today was an interesting day to test instruments. Winds varied from about 15 kts at 2600 to 26 kts at 3600 and favored a local ridge which added its own influence. It wasn't anywhere near good enough to go anywhere, so (unusually) I flew local, tested out XCSoar for the first time in flight and played with vector wind on the 302. I stand by my assessment of the 302 being inferior to the latest versions of the LNav+GPSNav. That older system would get good vector winds under normal thermal soaring cruise conditions as long as you were not flying in an arrow straight line. It would also frequently get useful updates on a meandering ridge. The 302 requires GPS track changes of close to 90 degrees to get a decent vector wind. Lesser changes will sometimes get updates, but frequently the updates will be a little funny -- definitely at odds with other recordings in the same airmass and therefore suspect. I think it's probably quicker, faster and more efficient to do a 360 turn if you really need a wind update. I've only ever been willing to do that once on a racing task, but it does work. XCSoar, happily, does vector wind in cruise quite nicely using the 302s GPS and TAS output. Nothing bad to say about this at all. It seems likely that it will out perform the 302. I'll be interested to see how this works in normal XC soaring. Darryl: my apologies for jumping down your throat. I *don't* think the 302 works as well as you say it does. In fact I think the vector wind in cruise capability it has is next to useless for performance XC and racing (my main interest) but clearly it does work in a limited sort of way that I can see *would* be useful for exploring a convergence, perhaps also wave, etc. Different strokes. -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
302 wind calculation | AK | Soaring | 0 | March 26th 10 02:47 AM |
XCSoar wind calculation | Martin Gregorie[_5_] | Soaring | 11 | October 8th 09 05:26 AM |
SeeYou Wind Calculation | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 3 | June 3rd 09 06:47 AM |
Vector Wind, Relative Wind calculation C 302/303 | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | December 9th 08 07:23 PM |
LX4000 wind calculation | AttentionLEcureuil | Soaring | 2 | June 23rd 04 04:33 AM |