![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 30, 10:44*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:30:32 -0700, Hatunen, who had formerly been on my side, suddenly launched an attack and called me incompetent at best and a liar at worst. Is this the quote where you say I called you a liar? I believe you have me mistaken for someone else. I've been known to disagree strongly with people on occasion but I don't recall ever calling someone a liar even in the most heated of exchanges. FWIW, I will make it quite clear for you in this post. I do NOT consider you a liar. I DO disagree on occasion with your opinions and have so stated. What gives? You were the most vocal of Mxsmanic's detractors, yet now suddenly you're taking his side against me. Is he paying you, or providing some other consideration? Because I doubt you had a genuine, spontaneous change of heart. Not TO rather than FROM the dark side. That kind of thing is generally rare and generally only goes in the other direction. I have no feeling for either you or Mx at this point in time. I have disagreed many times with Mx on many issues as I am in disagreement with you now on your charges of being called a liar. It is true that I have at times taken a VERY strong stance on things Mx has presented on these forums. In this thread however, I'm seeing comment by Mx that I happen to agree with as well as comment from others here that I think it incorrect in answers being presented to him. On Usenet it's always a thread by thread situation when it comes to agreeing or disagreeing with someone's comment. If I thought you were correct in this thread or any other thread I was posting to I wouldn't hesitate to agree with you. Then again, maybe you've recently suffered a head injury or something. This type of personal derogatory comment is part and parcel of exactly why I'm disagreeing with your input on this thread at this time. I won't respond in kind. All I can say is this is disappointing and unfortunate. Nonetheless it still leaves Mxsmanic with what, two allies and at least a dozen detractors? Things are still not looking good for Mxsmanic, no matter what dishonest tricks he might be using to try to bolster his side and undermine mine. This "contest" thing seems quite important to you as you keep referring to it. It's not important to me at all. On Usenet I judge comment as either right or wrong in each sentence contributed. My opinion in any response I offer is based on that and that alone. I take no side for or against anyone here. Usenet isn't personal with me any longer. I gave that up a while ago. I suggest you do the same. The funny thing is it's clear from his retinue of loyal detractors that he's a notorious troll, but what's less clear is where from. I'm pretty familiar with the rec.arts.tv rogue's gallery by now ("trotsky", "Ubiquitous", "Sound of Trumpet", and several nymshifting trolls including "the homophobe", "the Obamaphobe", and the infamous Seamus MacRae) and "Mxsmanic" isn't one of them. I'm guessing that like "Lady Veteran" and "womanGoddess" before him he's a troll principally of other groups that has decided to add to rec.arts.tv's sources of woe temporarily for reasons probably beyond the ability of any sane mind to fathom. My interest is restricted to aviation matters. That's why I come here. Mx can be a troll but I really don't care what he is. If his posts with me are legit I handle them as I would any other on topic post. If he goes off topic or trolls me I simply disengage. I used to take people on head to head but I make an honest effort not to do that any more. It just isn't worth the trouble. If you see me in some other light or see any agreement from me relating to MX as an affront to you, I can't be responsible for that. As I say, I deal with individuals I meet on Usenet AS individuals, NOT as a member of any "group" for or against someone on the forum. Sorry you see things the way you do but as I've said, I can't be responsible for how you relate to me. All I can do is inform you that you're mistaken. Best to you, Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot nearly crashes in IMC, Controller helps | pimenthal | Piloting | 32 | September 27th 05 01:06 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Toronto Plane Pilot Was Allowed To Land In "Red Alert" Weather | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 24 | August 19th 05 10:48 PM |
2 pilot/small airplane CRM | Mitty | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | September 1st 04 11:19 PM |
non-pilot lands airplane | Cub Driver | Piloting | 3 | August 14th 04 12:08 AM |
Home Builders are Sick Sick Puppies | pacplyer | Home Built | 11 | March 26th 04 12:39 AM |