If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:32:31 -0700, Hatunen wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:44:10 +0000 (UTC), Wingnut wrote: On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:30:32 -0700, Hatunen, who had formerly been on my side, suddenly launched an attack and called me incompetent at best and a liar at worst. What gives? You were the most vocal of Mxsmanic's detractors, yet now suddenly you're taking his side against me. Is he paying you, or providing some other consideration? Because I doubt you had a genuine, spontaneous change of heart. Not TO rather than FROM the dark side. That kind of thing is generally rare and generally only goes in the other direction. Being wrong is being wrong. Yes, but previously you were saying Mxsmanic was the one that was wrong. Now you're attacking me. What changed your mind regarding which of us was right? All I can say is this is disappointing and unfortunate. Nonetheless it still leaves Mxsmanic with what, two allies and at least a dozen detractors? Things are still not looking good for Mxsmanic, no matter what dishonest tricks he might be using to try to bolster his side and undermine mine. Now you're gtting nasty, calling me an ally of Mixie. I just call 'em as I see 'em. It seems you're a fair-weather ally. For a while you and I were both taking the same side against Mxsmanic's nonsense, but then suddenly a few days ago you turned on me and fired off with both barrels, and the devil of it is I did nothing I could identify to provoke you. Nothing I said should logically have offended you. All I can guess is Mxsmanic did something to pull you over to his side, rather than I did something to push you away from mine. Regardless of your undiplomatic and vague assertions that I'm "wrong", I continue to stand by what I said: "Consider who would have been landing the plane if something had caused the pilot to also conk out, though. Then her prior flight experience would have become quite relevant indeed." (Followup setting ignored; I don't want someone seeing your attack post in one of the other three groups and not also seeing my rebuttal, now, do I?) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot nearly crashes in IMC, Controller helps | pimenthal | Piloting | 32 | September 27th 05 01:06 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Toronto Plane Pilot Was Allowed To Land In "Red Alert" Weather | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 24 | August 19th 05 10:48 PM |
2 pilot/small airplane CRM | Mitty | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | September 1st 04 11:19 PM |
non-pilot lands airplane | Cub Driver | Piloting | 3 | August 14th 04 12:08 AM |
Home Builders are Sick Sick Puppies | pacplyer | Home Built | 11 | March 26th 04 12:39 AM |