![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 19, 4:19*pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: On 8/19/2010 9:23 AM, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Aug 19, 12:10 am, *wrote: BTW ADS-B products used in contests are going to be "interesting" for the poor CD to deal with, ... not just worry about somebody getting weather reports. I'd expect Flarm to have that though out given their existing "stealth mode" and logging of that mode setting. Couldn't a pilot just have 2 Flarms, 1 to turn stealth mode logs in with and a separate one to leach with? -Paul You'd have to smuggle it aboard and risk being disqualified and then if you turned it on both Flarms are going to alert on the other devices presence. If anybody knows if there is a way to suppress those warnings and have the smuggled aboard device usable for leaching (e.g. I wonder on PowerFLARM you might be able to turn the volume down and even if the built-in display is useless because it has popped up a traffic alert you might be able to bring up the moving map on an attached PDA - but you might need to suppress the traffic alert pop-up on that display (if the software supports that)). Flarm also logs random position data of other aircraft in the IGC log file and that can be uploaded to Flarm to do things like help Flarm analyze effective range etc. and improve their products. I wonder if turning on another Flarm or PowerFLARM unit in the same glider, even if you were stupid enough to somehow turn off all the annoying alerts between each unit and try to use it to leach off somebody that your "official" FLARM unit would capture the presence of the "illegal" unit in its IGC log file. Of course to catch you somebody really have to suspect you are cheating and would then have to analyze your Flarm IGC log file. I kind of see it as the workable way in glider contests is you allow/ require Flarm based products and ban other ADS-B receivers (not transmitters), Mode S TIS, even maybe in-cockpit reception of SPOT trackers, etc. or you have to open the gates fully and allow any tracking technology receivers and the full on leaching that probably implies. Darryl Banning ADS-B in contests???? *We are all trying to increase the safety of aviation by increasing situational awareness for all pilots and you guys are talking about banning one of the most promising technologies out there because someone might use it to cheat in a contest????? Does anyone have any concept on how absurd this makes us look outside (even inside) of our small insular world??? -- Mike Schumann- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In the UK we are supposed to use Flarm in 'stealth mode' for competitions, where it still warns you of impending collisions, but doesn't show you where other aircraft are that are not about to collide with you. I have to admit that I used a non-stealth Flarm unit in a 2009 Regional competition, and could often pick up other circling gliders ahead on the Flarm before I could see them, but only within a limited radius. Is looking for flashes of sunlight being reflected off the wings of a highly polished sailplane circling in the distance ahead of you also considered as cheating? Derek C |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trig TT21 transponder draws only 125 mA! | Steve Koerner | Soaring | 5 | March 15th 10 09:59 PM |
TRIG TT21 Transponders | Tim Mara[_2_] | Soaring | 12 | September 26th 09 02:01 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder receives FAA TSO approval | Paul Remde | Soaring | 12 | September 19th 09 02:47 PM |
Trig TT21 in Experimental Aircraft | Paul Remde | Soaring | 5 | July 5th 09 03:15 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder Thoughts? | jcarlyle | Soaring | 16 | June 23rd 09 04:38 PM |