![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Derek C" wrote in message
... snip Lasham bought a couple of DG1000s as all round trainers. However in practice they are mostly only used for advanced cross-country training. From a basic instructional point of view they are too complicated (tail weights etc), too difficult to get in and out of, and have awful ground handling (we have the 2 wheel version - the tail weights a ton). They spin rather too well and lose a lot of height in the process. We also have a couple of K21s which are great general purpose gliders, but as basic trainers they are, if anything, too docile and easy to fly, and won't spin with a normal weight male student in the front seat. We still use ancient although slightly updated K13s for most basic training. They do everything tolerably well, although more performance would be nice. I had the good fortune to get a bimble to Chievley and back last year in the turbo one. Ground handling is fine with the tail dolly on, but one of the dollys was defective so we had to go to the launch point to get the one that was OK. The tail is no heavier than my glider, and if you sit someone on the cockpit rail lifting it to get the dolly on is pretty easy. I agree it's difficult to get into, especially for the short of leg, and there is the danger of falling into the canopy which of course would probably do a lot of damage. All that needs is one of those plastic steps. That high wheel (assuming it doesn't collapse!) must be a great asset for a field landing if the stuff in the field isn't ideally short. We didn't spin it, nor did it feel anywhere near spinning at reasonable XC and thermalling speeds - unless it doesn't have a pre-stall buffet. Tail weights are IMHO a big improvement over water - for one thing no problem if it's going to be sub-zero - for another they are quicker to change than pouring water in or extracting it from a 500/505. I found the DG1000 was easy to fly and very easy to land - it has massively powerful airbrakes and wheel brake, there was no problem landing it in a small area from a position that was really too high and too close. However it's never ever going to be a primary trainer, as you wouldn't send someone for their first solo in it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Club Class Gliders | Sam Giltner[_1_] | Soaring | 4 | December 3rd 08 03:28 AM |
Basic Training Gliders | Derek Copeland | Soaring | 35 | December 26th 05 02:19 PM |
Basic Training Gliders | Justin Craig | Soaring | 0 | December 6th 05 10:07 PM |
Basic Training Gliders | Justin Craig | Soaring | 0 | December 6th 05 10:07 PM |
Soaring club close to NYC, with high-performance gliders | City Dweller | Soaring | 9 | September 29th 05 11:55 AM |