A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How do I legallly install winglets on a standard airworthiness certificate?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old November 21st 10, 06:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Scott[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 256
Default How do I legallly install winglets on a standard airworthinesscertificate?

On 11-21-2010 16:42, sisu1a wrote:
I don't recall a 337 as changing them to experimental...


337 has nothing to do with EXP/Std reg changeover. It is the number of
the form that stands for "major repair or alteration" and is typically
accompanied by a new weight and balance when major repairs
(reattaching a tailboom for instance) or alterations (like winglets),
although may not be necessarily in every case.

My SZD59 is EXP reg, but I still went the 337 route when I modded my
stock mechanical brakes to a hydraulic Cleveland setup. Didn't need
the w&b for this job, since the part total was within 1.5lbs of the
old setup and that is all predominantly on CofG, but I didn't trust my
old one and wanted to put some weight in the tail, so a fresh w&b was
useful to me to determine how much...

And why exactly do you want to keep the std reg? Do you use it in a
commercial capacity? (obviously not since it has 1 seat...) Exp rating
allows you a lot more leeway with *legally getting your ship/cockpit
dialed in etc. Work that falls somewhere between changing a tire and
needing a 337 still needs to be signed off by an A&P, but a 337 needs
an A&I and is much more involved. Std means anything beyond changing a
tire/simple maintenance level work has to be farmed out to an A&P,
regardless of your skills.

-Paul


Actually, I am not the one who started the thread about going into the
experimental category. The reason "I" would stay in the standard
category is to avoid any restrictions that may come with the
experimental category, such as for exhibition only, etc. I'm pretty
sure going to experimental would place various restrictions on the
flying of the aircraft. Also, going to an experimental certificate
won't eliminate the need for A&P inspections/sign offs. As far as I
know, only people with repairman certificates can sign off work on an
experimental "AMATEUR BUILT" aircraft and then only if they built a
majority of the aircraft. Just putting winglets on a certified bird
would not be a basis to get a repairman's certificate...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA Revoking Standard Airworthiness Certificate DG-505 NG Soaring 32 February 16th 17 02:23 PM
Airworthiness Certificate Replacement? [email protected] Soaring 6 June 26th 08 07:11 PM
USA Glider Experimental Airworthiness Certificate charlie foxtrot Soaring 4 April 15th 06 05:04 AM
Exhibition/Racing Airworthiness Certificate Question bsquared Soaring 5 June 22nd 04 06:24 PM
Airworthiness Directives for Jantar Standard 3 Miguel Lavalle Soaring 5 January 24th 04 10:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.