![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11-21-2010 16:42, sisu1a wrote:
I don't recall a 337 as changing them to experimental... 337 has nothing to do with EXP/Std reg changeover. It is the number of the form that stands for "major repair or alteration" and is typically accompanied by a new weight and balance when major repairs (reattaching a tailboom for instance) or alterations (like winglets), although may not be necessarily in every case. My SZD59 is EXP reg, but I still went the 337 route when I modded my stock mechanical brakes to a hydraulic Cleveland setup. Didn't need the w&b for this job, since the part total was within 1.5lbs of the old setup and that is all predominantly on CofG, but I didn't trust my old one and wanted to put some weight in the tail, so a fresh w&b was useful to me to determine how much... And why exactly do you want to keep the std reg? Do you use it in a commercial capacity? (obviously not since it has 1 seat...) Exp rating allows you a lot more leeway with *legally getting your ship/cockpit dialed in etc. Work that falls somewhere between changing a tire and needing a 337 still needs to be signed off by an A&P, but a 337 needs an A&I and is much more involved. Std means anything beyond changing a tire/simple maintenance level work has to be farmed out to an A&P, regardless of your skills. -Paul Actually, I am not the one who started the thread about going into the experimental category. The reason "I" would stay in the standard category is to avoid any restrictions that may come with the experimental category, such as for exhibition only, etc. I'm pretty sure going to experimental would place various restrictions on the flying of the aircraft. Also, going to an experimental certificate won't eliminate the need for A&P inspections/sign offs. As far as I know, only people with repairman certificates can sign off work on an experimental "AMATEUR BUILT" aircraft and then only if they built a majority of the aircraft. Just putting winglets on a certified bird would not be a basis to get a repairman's certificate... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Revoking Standard Airworthiness Certificate DG-505 | NG | Soaring | 32 | February 16th 17 02:23 PM |
Airworthiness Certificate Replacement? | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | June 26th 08 07:11 PM |
USA Glider Experimental Airworthiness Certificate | charlie foxtrot | Soaring | 4 | April 15th 06 05:04 AM |
Exhibition/Racing Airworthiness Certificate Question | bsquared | Soaring | 5 | June 22nd 04 06:24 PM |
Airworthiness Directives for Jantar Standard 3 | Miguel Lavalle | Soaring | 5 | January 24th 04 10:55 AM |