![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On 10 Feb 2004 00:23:38 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote: Subject: Radio - foul language From: "Paul J. Adam" Depends on timescales. If you're calling in a fire mission from a battery in direct support, or reporting a hot contact... the enemy will gain nothing from intercepting and translating your radio messages. They already know that Our Guys are fighting Their Guys at grid 123987, the spooks get told to clear the net for useful messages ![]() Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk Radio silence. Above all radio silence. Only guys on their first mission and scared to hell blurt over the command radio. And are so severely disciplined on landing that they will never do it again. Arthur Kramer Radio discipline is important. It's an absolute, even when it isn't necessary--as in modern ops where you've got secure comm. It still demonstrates professionalism if the radio chatter is eliminated. That being said, however, Art overlooks the situation. It's a ground commander calling for fire support. The ground commander's rep, calls for fire and must communicate the situation. If he maintains radio silence, no one knows the need for fire. If, under the duress of the moment, the FAC or controller adds an adjective, that can readily be forgiven. But Art is correct in the narrow sense that such traffic would *very* rarely be tolerated on the *command* net. Fire support would be handled on the fire support net, just as operations reports are handles on the ops net and CSS is handled on the admin/log net. Commanders, especially those with stars on their collars, tend to get rather testy when the folks initiating comms on their command nets are not either themselves or, somewhat grudgingly, their immediate subordinate commanders. As an aside, the best single comm I ever overheard on a command net was from an O-6 maneuver brigade commander responding to the O-7 ADC-M after being queried as to whether his elements were indeed moving out right *now* IAW the latest (rather confusing) last minute FRAGO-- "Roger that, we are moving out now....don't know where we are supposed to be going, but we are moving." Blurted out over the speaker in our CP; everyone in the CP stopped what they were doing and looked at each other, then burst out in guffaws. Surprisingly, he was not chastised for that somewhat irreverent (even if it was true) comment. Brooks Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(sorta OT) Free Ham Radio Course | RST Engineering | Home Built | 51 | January 24th 05 08:05 PM |
Good panel mount COM radio and intercom w/push-to-talk? | John Huebbe | Home Built | 10 | November 27th 04 07:58 PM |
Jim Weir or other qualified persons: a tangent on the 2 radio 1 antennathread | Dave S | Home Built | 12 | June 23rd 04 01:03 AM |
Air Force-Navy develop joint radio system | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 3rd 03 10:12 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Doug Carter | Home Built | 24 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |