A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Radio - foul language



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24  
Old February 10th 04, 02:51 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On 10 Feb 2004 00:23:38 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Radio - foul language
From: "Paul J. Adam"


Depends on timescales. If you're calling in a fire mission from a
battery in direct support, or reporting a hot contact... the enemy will
gain nothing from intercepting and translating your radio messages. They
already know that Our Guys are fighting Their Guys at grid 123987, the
spooks get told to clear the net for useful messages
Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk


Radio silence. Above all radio silence. Only guys on their first mission

and
scared to hell blurt over the command radio. And are so severely

disciplined
on landing that they will never do it again.


Arthur Kramer


Radio discipline is important. It's an absolute, even when it isn't
necessary--as in modern ops where you've got secure comm. It still
demonstrates professionalism if the radio chatter is eliminated.

That being said, however, Art overlooks the situation. It's a ground
commander calling for fire support. The ground commander's rep, calls
for fire and must communicate the situation. If he maintains radio
silence, no one knows the need for fire. If, under the duress of the
moment, the FAC or controller adds an adjective, that can readily be
forgiven.


But Art is correct in the narrow sense that such traffic would *very* rarely
be tolerated on the *command* net. Fire support would be handled on the fire
support net, just as operations reports are handles on the ops net and CSS
is handled on the admin/log net. Commanders, especially those with stars on
their collars, tend to get rather testy when the folks initiating comms on
their command nets are not either themselves or, somewhat grudgingly, their
immediate subordinate commanders. As an aside, the best single comm I ever
overheard on a command net was from an O-6 maneuver brigade commander
responding to the O-7 ADC-M after being queried as to whether his elements
were indeed moving out right *now* IAW the latest (rather confusing) last
minute FRAGO-- "Roger that, we are moving out now....don't know where we are
supposed to be going, but we are moving." Blurted out over the speaker in
our CP; everyone in the CP stopped what they were doing and looked at each
other, then burst out in guffaws. Surprisingly, he was not chastised for
that somewhat irreverent (even if it was true) comment.

Brooks



Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
Smithsonian Institution Press
ISBN #1-58834-103-8



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(sorta OT) Free Ham Radio Course RST Engineering Home Built 51 January 24th 05 08:05 PM
Good panel mount COM radio and intercom w/push-to-talk? John Huebbe Home Built 10 November 27th 04 07:58 PM
Jim Weir or other qualified persons: a tangent on the 2 radio 1 antennathread Dave S Home Built 12 June 23rd 04 01:03 AM
Air Force-Navy develop joint radio system Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 3rd 03 10:12 PM
Ham Radio In The Airplane Doug Carter Home Built 24 July 8th 03 03:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.