![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David E. Powell" wrote in message s.com... "Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... In message m, David E. Powell writes Thanks! I hadn't known about the 2.75 rockets, sounds like the F-94 Scorpion. The Falcon must have been a decent missile, the -106s and other fighters used them into the 80s and early 90s. No, it sucked really badly (less than 5% Pk in Vietnam, although against fighters at low level with some hostile factors) but it was a low priority for replacement or enhancement. Whoa - Considering how long they served I would have thought the opposite. No, Paul is correct. The Falcon did not have a very good record (F-4D's accounted for five Migs with it over Vietnam). But remember that it was really the first generation AAM in the USAF. A good summary of the Falcon and its capabilities can be found at Andreas' site: http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-4.html Maybe it was felt they had better odds against bombers. It probably would have. Or there was some sort of upgrade by the '80s. Considering alot of ANG fighters that escorted bombers up and down the seacost in the Cold War carried them. The Falcon did go through upgrades throughout its career. The final ones in service (AIM-4F/G limited to use on the F-106) were undoubtedly better and more capable than the early sixties variants, with greater range, larger warheads, and better maneuverability than the original AIM-4A and later AIM-4D. It still was not a 8great* missile, but developing further improvments or going to the expense of trying to integrate a newer missile into the F-106 as it approached the twilight of its career was not going to happen. The Swedes produced their own conventionally armed variant of the AIM-26, the Rb-27, which served with their Drakens (and IIRC Viggens) up through the mid-eighties. I wonder if GWB ever flew with the nuclear version....? Who knows? But it would have been unlikely, as the AIM-26 was phased out of US service by 1971. Brooks DEP Maybe that's why the F-106 got a cannon.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
D.C. Air Guard Unit Flies New 737s | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 14th 04 11:12 PM |