A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old October 7th 12, 04:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Which sustainer system would you chose for your sailplane?

Dne sobota, 29. september 2012 18:16:36 UTC+2 je oseba Greg Arnold napisala:
On 9/29/2012 8:42 AM, slbair wrote:





Motor cooling is handled via a small electric fan forward of the rudder pedals, an air vent in the nose cone that allows outside air to help cool the motor (and the cockpit), and 3 electric fans on the shelf behind the pilot's seat to cool the controller. When the batteries get low, warnings go off on the FCU, and I would then throttle back and turn off the FES. There is no automatic shutdown of the FES which allows the pilot to keep the FES running if there is an emergency situation. Thx - Renny








On our latest instalations, we manage to arrange cooling also without electric fan infront of pedals. Motor itself has bigger centrifugal ventilator at back side!








Regards, Luka




Luka,




It sounds like a number of incremental changes have been made to the FES system that have not yet been posted to your web site. Could you write a post detailing these changes and perhaps also let us know what's coming in the near future? Thanks,




SLB






Luka:



Since the prop now automatically stops in same position each time, does

this mean that the cross section shape of the fuselage at the nose no

longer has to be circular, but instead could be oval like on many

gliders? This would require the spinner to be oval -- does an oval

spinner shape present problems?



I second the idea of better information in one place on the web page.

Right now, anyone wanting accurate information must be a sleuth who

reads multiple webpages, who reads a PDF brochure, and who peruses RAS

postings by Luka and others. Sherlock Holmes, we need you!



Dear Greg,

Your thinking is correct! For Silent we are using now already slightly oval - eliptic shape of spinner at fuselage front cut. Small amount of ovality does not present any problem, but need to explore possibilities of even higher ovality...
We will try to publish latest data and achievements on our website more regulary. Now pilots can sigh in for our newsletter, where those informations will be published when it will be apropriate.
Sign in for newsletter:
http://www.front-electric-sustainer.com/newsletter.php

Kind regards,

Luka Znidarsic, FES development
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front Electric Sustainer Dan Marotta Soaring 28 January 31st 13 01:32 AM
would an electric sustainer be practical Brad[_2_] Soaring 7 July 24th 09 06:29 PM
Which Came First, the Santa Monica Airport, Or Those Who Chose To Build Their Homes Adjacent To It? Larry Dighera Piloting 16 May 7th 07 10:34 PM
BAF or CEF? I chose BAF. Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 23rd 04 04:33 PM
DG goes the sustainer option. Paul Soaring 25 June 4th 04 12:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.