![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:41:58 -0600, - Barnyard BOb - wrote:
Without knowing the number of flight hours involved, accurate safety details and analysis are destined to remain shrouded in much fog, mystery and hype. Certainly. But of course, we'll probably never have that sort of data, unless the EAA does a membership survey. We can't fully rely on the online NTSB accident reports, either, because they only mention the engine type when engine-related problems were a factor in the accident. Unless we pay for and analyze the hard-copy reports, we don't know how many of the other 2200+ homebuilt accidents since 1990 involved auto-engine homebuilts. However, I can see those with an agenda abusing the incomplete data to bolster a particular point of view. Yep...that's why I couched the information in cautious terms, in some cases...there just isn't enough depth to the statistics. For instance, during the 1990-2003 time period, three Fly Babies and three RV-3s suffered in-flight wing failures. One out of every five Fly Baby or RV-3 crash. What's important is the root causes; in the Fly Baby case, two out of the three crashes were errors in maintenance, and the other involved the builder deviating from the plans. But the raw data certainly looks bad. The RV-3 problems are similarly well known... NTSB accident report FTW98FA145 offers great insight. But those who want to slam either aircraft have plenty of ammunition. I picture an average RV3 flying mega-more hours a year than any BD-5 whizzing around in little circles because of reliability issues and no x-country capability. Ditto for my trusty Fly Baby. The question is, what is the average annual flight time for the entire homebuilt fleet? Again, we'll never know unless EAA mounts some sort of effort. I put about 40 hours a year on my Fly Baby, but I live in mild-weather country. Then again, I had a buddy with an IFR ticket and a Bonanza, and he only flew 60 hours a year. It's a matter of averages, not the few stand-outs (or, in the case of Fly Babies, stand-unders :-). It's great you're able to fly your RV-3 so much, Bob, but what about the previous owner? When did he make the first flight, how many years did he own it, and how many hours did he put on the plane until he sold it do you? What's the average annual flight time on the airplane since it made its first flight? In my case, the plane first flew in 1982 and the plane has ~350 hours. That's only about 17 hours/year average. Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pitts Seat Mod | Martin Morgan | Aerobatics | 0 | November 21st 03 03:56 AM |
Seat cushion | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 14 | August 5th 03 07:16 PM |
Seat cushions | Big John | Home Built | 3 | July 31st 03 10:59 PM |
DK-1 All Metal single seat biplane | Michael | Home Built | 0 | July 28th 03 05:16 PM |