A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aerotow ropes: short or long, breakable or unbreakable?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old November 13th 13, 02:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Cookie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 152
Default Aerotow ropes: short or long, breakable or unbreakable?

I have a number of questions about tow ropes on my Pre solo written test which I give to my students.

After explaining the FAR's , I then ask them, "thinking as a glider pilot, would you rather have a tow rope which is on the stronger side, or on the weaker side?" They almost always answer "stronger", and I agree. But I caution, stronger within reason. In my way of thinking...I have the option to pull the release if things get too gnarly...but at least that release is on my terms, not the rope's.

My rough calculations show that the "normal" tension on a tow rope in smooth tow is very low...It is basically the drag on the glider, plus a tiny bit extra due to the climb vector...so maybe 60 lbs tension...

Almost all ropes I've seen at glider ports are in the 2000 lb breaking strength area....so rope breaks "should" be unlikely. But obviously they do break...so I attribute this to wear of damage....

I think the 80% ~ 200% is a pretty good "rule"...but again I want close to the 200%.

In 8000 flights, I have had 5 (if I remember correctly) tow rope "incidents".

Only two were classic rope breaks...and these happened on the ground roll..where the rope tension is quite high.

Another was a failure at the attachment of the rope to a weak link, not the rope actually breaking...(long story here)

another was the failure of the tow ring...but this was not an "approved" tow ring...it was somebody's idea of a "new and improved" ring...which of course failed...luckily at 400' and we were certainly expecting it. Funny thing about this one...it was in 2-33....at 400' I heard "tink"....which I figured was the tow ring breaking. We returned to the airport to find that the ring was in perfect condition. We looked at the tow hook on the Schweizer and it was still closed and in perfect condition. The guy in front was flying at the time...he got a bit of slack in the rope, when the slack come out, the rope was disconnected. What I think happened was the slack allowed the ring to twist around and back release the schweizer hook. They have a habit of bouncing back closed so it looked like it never released and the ring separated as if by magic.

Lastly, while doing a scenic ride, I noticed something first near the tow plane, which then seemed to be headed toward me...a black thing....turns out this was part of the tail spring, to which the tow rope was attached. It came straight and level back toward me for quite a while, but then finally arced and fell under the glider. So again, not a real rope break.

As for rope length..some operators will cut out a short section of worn rope at the end, and splice it back on the ring...so over time the rope gets shorter and shorter. I has a tow just last week with a student...and a really short rope. First of all, that Pawnee looked really "big"...but the student had a bit more trouble on tow than usual.

I've done long distance tows, where we attached two 200' ropes together to give 400' tow rope. This is luxury! The interaction between glider and tow plane is cut down dramatically!


Cookie








On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:22:14 AM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
With the dewpoint at 15d F. today, I'm ready to heat things up.



Regulations on aerotow ropes vary by region. What is the evidence to support the various approaches?



PTT (Premature Termination of Tow)(aka rope break) correlates with a number of fatal accidents. How often has a hard_to_break towrope led to a fatal accident?



Options to land after a PTT vary by airport and can be non-existent at certain altitudes. Why is an extra strong towrope not an option where the straight-ahead landing option is poor or non-existent?



In what year did the FAA set the FAR for towropes and what was the quality of towropes at that time? (obscure, but interesting question).



At the airport where I am towed, the same towrope satisfies the FAR for both the frequently towed heavier two-seater, and my less frequently towed lighter weight single place glider. Does this mean that the two-place is more likely to break the towrope?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
long range aircraft flying short-range routes? tupolev204 Piloting 10 April 22nd 11 07:44 PM
FAA Administrator and FAA on the ropes and going broke PapaFoxTrot Piloting 0 September 16th 08 03:33 PM
Charging system failure cuts short a long X-Country Ron Lee[_2_] Piloting 10 November 15th 07 11:04 PM
Tow Ropes [email protected] Soaring 6 July 15th 05 07:39 PM
Plasma Ropes ----- Help Dave Martin Soaring 7 September 30th 03 11:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.