A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aerotow ropes: short or long, breakable or unbreakable?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old November 14th 13, 09:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Aerotow ropes: short or long, breakable or unbreakable?

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:36:01 PM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:35:41 AM UTC-5, Evan Ludeman wrote: So... is this operation experiencing rope failure without overload? That does not tell us that their current procedure has a reasonable safety margin. In 27 years in the sport, I've never seen this. If I did see it I'd change my procedures. Wait for a failure before evaluating procedures?? At some of my favorite places to fly, a PTT at 50 - 300' has some significant risks, so we take launch prep fairly seriously, the tow plane pre-launch checkout includes a warmup flight, etc. We don't break ropes, we inspect them visually and service them before they get ugly. We have no need for an ASTM approved test program.... The collective wisdom and experience of many people have developed the status quo, and I'm sure that it makes sense on balance, but does anyone know how close to failure ropes get before they are retired? And there is the matter of how our uncertainty about the rope affects training and flight reviews. I watched a glider enter a spin after a "simulated rope break" during a biennial flight review (glider totaled, no injuries, pilot retired). Maybe "that should not have happened", but I'm left with the impression that PTT simulation is risky. That the probability of a PTT is currently high enough to justify the risk of PTT simulation is part of my motivation. Can the probability of a PTT be lowered to the point that the risk of PTT simulation is no longer justified? How far can better rope material choice and better (practical) inspection go towards eliminating the possibility of PTT?


12000 glider flights, about 7500 tows given, and the only rope breaks have been during initial acceleration. Maybe 1/2 dozen or so of those. And a couple on the tug end from hanging the rope in a tree.
I've done hundreds of PTT and do not see why they should create an increased risk that would justify not doing that training. I want to KNOW(as well as possible) that the person I'm teaching or reviewing will respond correctly in the event that a failure happens. That failure could be many reasons, broken rope being one.
Real rope breaks are, thankfully, pretty rare. From this I conclude most operations are taking suitable care.
FWIW
UH
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
long range aircraft flying short-range routes? tupolev204 Piloting 10 April 22nd 11 07:44 PM
FAA Administrator and FAA on the ropes and going broke PapaFoxTrot Piloting 0 September 16th 08 03:33 PM
Charging system failure cuts short a long X-Country Ron Lee[_2_] Piloting 10 November 15th 07 11:04 PM
Tow Ropes [email protected] Soaring 6 July 15th 05 07:39 PM
Plasma Ropes ----- Help Dave Martin Soaring 7 September 30th 03 11:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.