A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TE probe installation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old December 5th 14, 05:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default TE probe installation

On Friday, December 5, 2014 11:26:06 AM UTC-5, Jim Lewis wrote:
Thank you JP. I'll dig into the info today.

Forgive me for this simple-minded question. What pressure (static, dynamic, total) is provided to the variometer by the TE probe? I have read that a TE probe must create a pressure inverse but equal in maginitude to the dynamic pressure at the pitot. This confuses me. I thought the pitot 'receives' total pressure not just dynamic pressure.

I do understand that a variometer is a flow meter that responds to the flow of air between a capacity and the pressure sensed by the static ports. Does the TE probe provide this static pressure (offset by changes in dynamic pressure created by the glider varying airspeeds) or is the TE probe providing dynamic pressure to its side of the variometer?

I am trying to understand the TE process without being able to actually measure the pressures involved.

Thank you.


The pitot does indeed have an absolute pressure equal to local static pressure plus dynamic pressure. An airspeed indicator compares this to static, so far all intents and purposes, static pressure is meaningless.
A FLOW type variometer uses TE pressure(Pitot x -1) to compensate the variometer for velocity change. Static is not a factor.
In transducer type varios, there is no flow. These devices use pitot compared to static, and TE compared to static to get a similar result. Some others do not use TE pressure and derive required input by inverting pitot signal electronically.
For most folks it is good enough top take this stuff on "faith". It does work.
UH
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TE probe? [email protected] Soaring 12 July 29th 14 03:54 AM
TE probe up or down? kirk.stant Soaring 25 September 29th 10 07:48 PM
Ka-6 TE Probe vontresc Soaring 14 August 30th 08 03:17 AM
TE Probe on ASW-15 [email protected] Soaring 4 April 29th 07 01:43 AM
TE-Probe for 1-26D Heinz Gehlhaar Soaring 6 January 17th 05 10:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.