Help us with this petition for security on anti-collision systems

On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 7:29:47 PM UTC-4, Lucas wrote:
On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 2:33:02 PM UTC+2, Tango Eight wrote:
On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 8:10:48 AM UTC-4, wrote:
We wish to thank everybody. We have some 900 pilots (and are growing) that think that the protocol should be free and then everybody is free to buy the system he prefers!

No monopoly, especially on security. IGC should agree with this.
THANKS AGAIN

One more time...

Did DSX and Flarm have an agreement, or did DSX reverse engineer Flarm's IP without Flarm's blessing?

I think we know the answer. I know what my response would be to a competitor that reverse engineered *my* IP.

Petitions are for losers, anyway. You want to do business, you behave like businessmen.

-Evan Ludeman / T8

One more time: have you read the previous posts ?
If yes: you know that the T-Advisor works in a different way and the hardware is more performing. What is reverse engineer for ?
If not, you can go up and read them.

Are you connected with Flarm ?
If you mention the IP, you are supposed to know them. Can you write here for everyone what IP Flarm has ?
Again, it's in the previous posts, so it is clear that you have not read them or you ignore them purposely.
To show that you know the subject, write here the IP that Flarm has.
Otherwise you make allegations without any base, which is useless for a discussion and a bad behavior.

No, I am not affiliated with Flarm. I am a retail customer. See how easy that is? You ask a question, I give you a simple straight answer. It's how civilized adults interact.

There's a song I like to whistle at times like this, and it even involves a strawman.

-Evan Ludeman / T8