![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Stickney wrote:
It's all a balancing act - but in ggeneral, you're best off going with the largest diameter propeller with the fewest number of blades that you can practically manage. i) I'm sure I remember seeing, years ago, a picture of a Noorduyn Norseman with a single-bladed prop. Since you seem to know what you are talking about (more than I do, anyway), what factors would drive a manufacturer to adopt such a radical solution? ii) Radical solutions such as the Unducted Fan proposals mooted a few years ago, had many curved blades - any idea what gain they were seeking that justified the loss in efficiency? iii) How does this work with contraprops? On the face of it they must interfere with each other horribly, but they seem to fly quite well. Can you point me in the direction of some clues? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All I Wanted For Christmas Were Inverted Spins | [email protected] | Aerobatics | 3 | December 29th 04 07:40 PM |
VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") | Roberto Waltman | Home Built | 2 | October 29th 04 04:21 PM |
inverted spin recovery explanation | Alan Wood | Aerobatics | 18 | August 19th 04 03:32 PM |
Double covering fabric covered wings | [email protected] | Home Built | 9 | May 9th 04 08:39 PM |
Crooked or Wavy Trailing Edges of Wings and Control Surfaces | Larry Smith | Home Built | 3 | October 24th 03 02:31 AM |