A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Emergency Exit



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old July 2nd 18, 06:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jonathan St. Cloud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,463
Default Emergency Exit

On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 2:22:38 PM UTC-7, Mike Schumann wrote:
On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:00:18 PM UTC-5, Dave Walsh wrote:
At 19:04 30 June 2018, Mike Schumann wrote:
On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 1:45:05 PM UTC-5, Dave

Walsh wrote:
At 14:33 30 June 2018, Dan Marotta wrote:
To me the major advantages of a BRS over a

personal=20
parachute are the=20
speed and certainty of deployment.=C2=A0 Of course

either=20
system may fail or=20
malfunction, but with the BRS, you lose the difficulty

of=20
getting out=20
into space and deploying at in unfavorable position.

Simply=20
pull the=20
handle and enjoy the ride.

But, upon landing in a windy situation, you run the

very=20
real risk of=20
being killed in a tumbling, disintegrating wreck

being=20
dragged along the=20
ground.=C2=A0 Is there a jettison capability that could

be armed=20
by the=20
sudden deceleration of landing?=C2=A0 Perhaps an

automatic=20
jettison?=C2=A0 Might=20
that malfunction at 500' and give you a last thrilling

ride?

On 6/29/2018 10:49 PM, Charlie Quebec wrote:
Beacause floating around out of control under a=20
parachute is safer?
BRS sounds good, but in practice I would prefer

a=20
personal chute every
time.

--=20
Dan, 5J

Of course you could be struck by lightening as you

descend=20
under your BRS canopy but has anyone ever died

being=20
"dragged along the ground" after a successful BRS

escape?
Plenty have died following a conventional parachute mal-
function.
The bottom line is that BRS will work at a lower height

but is=20
hardly available in any common sailplane on sale today.
Retro fitting a BRS to an EASA sailplane would be a=20
expensive, possibly impossible, task. With ultra-light=20
sailplanes it's different.
The other major problem, as clearly explained on

DG's=20
website, is that "safety does not sell sailplanes". The=20
majority of DG sailplanes sold were NOT equipped with

the=20
NOAH system: the new buyers simply did not order

the=20
NOAH system. Even if BRS was available today how

many=20
buyers would buy it?
Dave W

If a BRS system were available factory installed at a

reasonable price, I
s=
uspect that a very large percentage of buyers would sign

up. It's a huge
s=
elling point if you are trying to get the OK from your

spouse to upgrade
to=
a new glider. =20

Offering a BRS system standard on all of their airplanes is

probably the
#1=
reason that Cirrus is now the largest piston engine aircraft

manufacturer
=
in the world.


Yes you're probably quite right about the Cirrus BUT in a
Cirrus you might well have wife and kids along for the ride.
The fact remains that the majority of DG customers do not
specify the NOAH system; it's actually relatively cheap
compared to the new cost of a DG808C or DG1000x. Why is
that?
Dave W


Maybe people think that the NOAH system is a half baked solution. Cirrus and Phoenix think that BRS systems are important enough that they make them standard and a significant part of their marketing.


The NOAH system is far from "half baked". DG actually developed a system that works, and they are the only ones that have for a glider. Approximately two thirds of the non-motor gliders sold, have sustainers engines where the BRS would go, hence the NOAH. This is an emergency assist. The chance of needing such a device is as rare as needing to jump, yet DG stepped up to the plate and designed and tested a solution, that is affordable (about 4,000 euro before installation). Comparing Phoenix and Cirrus aircraft, with their marketing, design, customers base, and funding sources, to gliding is with all due respect "half baked".
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air exit vent with engine box? [email protected] Soaring 5 December 8th 15 04:14 AM
An elegant exit Frank Whiteley Soaring 2 May 15th 09 02:28 PM
Accident report - PDA's can restrict emergency exit Ramy Soaring 21 December 31st 06 05:45 PM
How do you exit a F-22 cockpit? John Dallman Naval Aviation 1 May 28th 06 02:51 PM
How do you exit a F-22 cockpit? Mike Naval Aviation 11 May 25th 06 08:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.