A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Vne



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 19, 01:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default Vne

On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 7:02:57 AM UTC-8, Echo wrote:
Haven't read that, would be an interesting one though. I'd always been under the impression Vne is a flutter protection speed. That's why it's a TAS that doesn't change with weight like Va. Wouldn't be surprised if it was from some old math though.


I always thought Vne was an operational limit to airworthiness, usually derived from the flutter speed. Also that flutter speed was an odd power function of altitude (because it varies somewhat with density but not as fast as IAS, therefore TAS is safe). Also that it is an oscillatory phenomena which depends on the stiffness, mass, and forcing function - so practically does depend on weight (or at least mass), particularly of the wings but secondarily the fuselage. But that function would be way too complicated to put on the placard or even into regulations so no change is assumed.

I also didn't think it was required to air test flutter speed anymore, but could be calculated with mass, stiffness, and CFD codes.
  #2  
Old November 11th 19, 02:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Vne

jfitch wrote on 11/10/2019 5:11 PM:
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 7:02:57 AM UTC-8, Echo wrote:
Haven't read that, would be an interesting one though. I'd always been under
the impression Vne is a flutter protection speed. That's why it's a TAS that
doesn't change with weight like Va. Wouldn't be surprised if it was from
some old math though.


I always thought Vne was an operational limit to airworthiness, usually derived
from the flutter speed. Also that flutter speed was an odd power function of
altitude (because it varies somewhat with density but not as fast as IAS,
therefore TAS is safe). Also that it is an oscillatory phenomena which depends
on the stiffness, mass, and forcing function - so practically does depend on
weight (or at least mass), particularly of the wings but secondarily the
fuselage. But that function would be way too complicated to put on the placard
or even into regulations so no change is assumed.

I also didn't think it was required to air test flutter speed anymore, but
could be calculated with mass, stiffness, and CFD codes.


Ground vibration testing can also aid in determining flutter characteristics. I
don't know what is required of our gliders. The Perlan 2 glider underwent
substantial amounts of ground vibration testing, and it's flight envelope is
gradually extended by in-flight vibration testing, at various altitudes and
speeds, to corroborate the ground testing results. The vibration is supplied by
eccentric, electric motor driven weights built into the wings.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me)
- "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation"
https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.