Quack, quack! It's all about credibility you don't have, Duckboy!

In article , wrote:

I don't think anyone can disagree with your opening statment, it's
where you go with it that's the question.


It's a follow-up "for the record", to _any_ post he makes, on that subject.
Exactly the same challenge issued to him, as he issued to Chuck.


It is done to ensure that he cannot get away with the 'big lie' approach.

Yeah, its a rehash of 'old news' to the RAH regulars. but it ensures he won't
be able to fool any 'new blood'. Not now, not ever. Safely archived
on Google, for anybody to find, who searches on his name.

Lastly, he *publicly*stated* that he _doesn't_care_ if I call him a liar and a
fraud. So he _can't_ EVER come after me for libel/slander for saying it.

In article rs.com,
says...

In article , wrot
e:

I don't think anyone can disagree with your opening statment, it's
where you go with it that's the question.


It's a follow-up "for the record", to _any_ post he makes, on that sub
ject.
Exactly the same challenge issued to him, as he issued to Chuck.


It is done to ensure that he cannot get away with the 'big lie' approa
ch.

Yeah, its a rehash of 'old news' to the RAH regulars. but it ensures h
e won't
be able to fool any 'new blood'. Not now, not ever. Safely archived
on Google, for anybody to find, who searches on his name.

Lastly, he *publicly*stated* that he _doesn't_care_ if I call him a li
ar and a
fraud. So he _can't_ EVER come after me for libel/slander for saying
it.


As long as Juan refuses to answer the question it sure appears that he
is a liar and a fraud. Maybe the regular posting of the question keeps
him quiet since he hasn't posted much lately Keep on posting the
question.