![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, December 16, 2019 at 2:03:02 PM UTC-6, princiar wrote:
Anyone has experience towing a trailer with a car with the trailer sway mitigation installed? Check out this technical paper (https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/porta...JAUTO981.pdf); it is really pretty easy to digest. Figures 9-14 provide the important results. Figure 10 shows that minimizing the yaw inertia of the trailer provides the largest impact on damping ratio, and thus the safe towing speed. Figure 9 shows that adding tongue weight above about 6-7% does not really improve the speed very much. Figure 11 shows that changes in the overall trailer mass do not greatly impact the safe towing speed. Figure 13 shows that making a large change in tire pressure (from 30 to 40 psi) only changes the speed for the same damping ratio by a couple of mph. Figure 14 shows that adding a friction stabilizer likewise only changes the speed a couple of mph. Most composite glider since the 1970s load the wing roots to the front of the trailer, and this directly helps lower the yaw inertia of the trailer. However, many older wood gliders with large root chords load the wing roots aft. For these trailers, the axle must be mounted further aft to help control the yaw inertia so that the trailer can be pulled at highway speeds. Trailers that load over the tongue should have the wing roots forward, and these should be similar to more modern trailers. I have one of these for a Ka-6, and it is a real detriment for drag with the big flat door directly into the wind, even behind a full-size van. As for tires, if one wants to travel above 65 mph, trailer tires are probably not what you want, since it is above their speed rating. If you drive on Interstate highways, this could be an issue, unless you are comfortable backing up traffic. I myself prefer the radial tires that are not speed limited (at least to normal road speed limits) and are likely to give a smoother ride for my glider as well. As long as I load the trailer to have a safe margin with damping ratio and I have reasonable pressure in the tires, I have towed single-seat trailers with my Ford E-150 passenger van, my wife's 1999 Volvo V70, my 2003 Ford Focus, or even years ago, my old 1981 Volvo 245. Towing with the 245 (108 hp max at SL) limited my speed significantly when climbing over mountain passes in Oregon, but it did okay on the level, albeit normally not using overdrive. One should also respect the max speed when towing with a smaller car though, because of the time, distance, and stability to do a panic stop with the increase in total weight. Read the paper and try not to overthink this topic. Load your trailer properly, air up whatever tires you choose, and drive safely. ... Neal P. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Johnstone wrote on 12/23/2019 1:36 AM:
What is worth remembering is that the cause of the sway is aerodynamic. Loading, tyre pressure, fiction dampers can only ensure that the sway is damped out and does not increase. Trailers with less vertical surface area aft of the wheels suffer less from snaking than those with equal or greater vertical surface area behind the wheels. You may not be able to change the aerodynamics of the trailer but a good friction damper and proper loading will normally ensure that the snaking is damped. I have been a passenger in a car towing a Cobra trailer at over 100mph, scared the crap out of me but it was completely stable, but only when loaded with the glider. Empty it was a different story. How did you decide aerodynamics was the important factor, and not other factors like tongue length, tires, etc? That's counterintuitive and, for example, it's at significant variance with Nelson Funston's paper on towing glider trailers, which does not include aerodynamic factors. http://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/...wnload/779/737 -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 15:35 23 December 2019, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Don Johnstone wrote on 12/23/2019 1:36 AM: What is worth remembering is that the cause of the sway is aerodynamic. Loading, tyre pressure, fiction dampers can only ensure that the sway is damped out and does not increase. Trailers with less vertical surface area aft of the wheels suffer less from snaking than those with equal or greater vertical surface area behind the wheels. You may not be able to change the aerodynamics of the trailer but a good friction damper and proper loading will normally ensure that the snaking is damped. I have been a passenger in a car towing a Cobra trailer at over 100mph, scared the crap out of me but it was completely stable, but only when loaded with the glider. Empty it was a different story. How did you decide aerodynamics was the important factor, and not other factors like tongue length, tires, etc? That's counterintuitive and, for example, it's at significant variance with Nelson Funston's paper on towing glider trailers, which does not include aerodynamic factors. http://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/...wnload/779/737 -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ions/download- the-guide-1 From observation of driving trailers over many years. Aerodynamic forces are almost always the initial cause of the onset of snaking, the other factors take over in damping out, or increasing the initial disturbance. I can be towing at say 60mph in clear air. If I am overtaken, especially by a large vehicle I fist notice that as the vehicle is alongside the trailer is drawn towards the other vehicle, when the vehicle has passed the trailer moves away and this is where the snake starts. From that point on the other mentioned factors take over, which, almost without exception, we all use stabilisers, mostly ALKO type |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Johnstone wrote on 12/24/2019 2:20 AM:
At 15:35 23 December 2019, Eric Greenwell wrote: Don Johnstone wrote on 12/23/2019 1:36 AM: What is worth remembering is that the cause of the sway is aerodynamic. Loading, tyre pressure, fiction dampers can only ensure that the sway is damped out and does not increase. Trailers with less vertical surface area aft of the wheels suffer less from snaking than those with equal or greater vertical surface area behind the wheels. You may not be able to change the aerodynamics of the trailer but a good friction damper and proper loading will normally ensure that the snaking is damped. I have been a passenger in a car towing a Cobra trailer at over 100mph, scared the crap out of me but it was completely stable, but only when loaded with the glider. Empty it was a different story. How did you decide aerodynamics was the important factor, and not other factors like tongue length, tires, etc? That's counterintuitive and, for example, it's at significant variance with Nelson Funston's paper on towing glider trailers, which does not include aerodynamic factors. http://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/...wnload/779/737 From observation of driving trailers over many years. Aerodynamic forces are almost always the initial cause of the onset of snaking, the other factors take over in damping out, or increasing the initial disturbance. I can be towing at say 60mph in clear air. If I am overtaken, especially by a large vehicle I fist notice that as the vehicle is alongside the trailer is drawn towards the other vehicle, when the vehicle has passed the trailer moves away and this is where the snake starts. From that point on the other mentioned factors take over, which, almost without exception, we all use stabilisers, mostly ALKO type As you state, swaying typically starts with a "trigger" event, and crosswinds or large trucks are common triggers; however, it can also be a twitch on the steering wheel from inattention, dodging road debris, moving away from another vehicle drifting too close beside you, uneven road surfaces, higher speeds while passing another vehicle, etc. The trigger is not important, but the trailer's inherent stability is. On the other hand, there are reports of trailer aerodynamics directly affecting the trailer stability. The two I know about were both the older Komet style trailers with "doghouses" or "tail fins" that were airfoil shaped like vertical stabilizers without the rudder. Both owners reported significant reduction in swaying by putting "spoilers" near the leading edge on each side of the fin. The spoilers were about 1/2" high and a few inches back from the leading edge. The now common Cobra trailers have blunt leading edges and flat, truncated trailing edges that apparently don't produce the lift the Komet fins did. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, December 24, 2019 at 9:06:36 AM UTC-6, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Don Johnstone wrote on 12/24/2019 2:20 AM: At 15:35 23 December 2019, Eric Greenwell wrote: Don Johnstone wrote on 12/23/2019 1:36 AM: What is worth remembering is that the cause of the sway is aerodynamic. Loading, tyre pressure, fiction dampers can only ensure that the sway is damped out and does not increase. Trailers with less vertical surface area aft of the wheels suffer less from snaking than those with equal or greater vertical surface area behind the wheels. You may not be able to change the aerodynamics of the trailer but a good friction damper and proper loading will normally ensure that the snaking is damped. I have been a passenger in a car towing a Cobra trailer at over 100mph, scared the crap out of me but it was completely stable, but only when loaded with the glider. Empty it was a different story. How did you decide aerodynamics was the important factor, and not other factors like tongue length, tires, etc? That's counterintuitive and, for example, it's at significant variance with Nelson Funston's paper on towing glider trailers, which does not include aerodynamic factors. http://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/...wnload/779/737 From observation of driving trailers over many years. Aerodynamic forces are almost always the initial cause of the onset of snaking, the other factors take over in damping out, or increasing the initial disturbance. I can be towing at say 60mph in clear air. If I am overtaken, especially by a large vehicle I fist notice that as the vehicle is alongside the trailer is drawn towards the other vehicle, when the vehicle has passed the trailer moves away and this is where the snake starts. From that point on the other mentioned factors take over, which, almost without exception, we all use stabilisers, mostly ALKO type As you state, swaying typically starts with a "trigger" event, and crosswinds or large trucks are common triggers; however, it can also be a twitch on the steering wheel from inattention, dodging road debris, moving away from another vehicle drifting too close beside you, uneven road surfaces, higher speeds while passing another vehicle, etc. The trigger is not important, but the trailer's inherent stability is. On the other hand, there are reports of trailer aerodynamics directly affecting the trailer stability. The two I know about were both the older Komet style trailers with "doghouses" or "tail fins" that were airfoil shaped like vertical stabilizers without the rudder. Both owners reported significant reduction in swaying by putting "spoilers" near the leading edge on each side of the fin. The spoilers were about 1/2" high and a few inches back from the leading edge.. The now common Cobra trailers have blunt leading edges and flat, truncated trailing edges that apparently don't produce the lift the Komet fins did. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 My main concern is with trailer dynamics is safety, and for that, an aerodynamic disturbance can initiate a major oscillation that can be dangerous. Once started, the dynamics of the system is primary and aerodynamics is secondary. However, for comfort while towing, one would like to deal with small-amplitude oscillations that are not dangerous, just annoying. For this, aerodynamics is important. In general, fins near the back of the trailer could be useful, however, most lack the finesse of a good airfoil and will have some separation. They tend to have a larger than desired thickness to chord ratio, and the closure angle of airfoil to the trailing edge can also be high.. Both of these design 'features' can lead to separation on the sides of the fin. When separation occurs, it causes a change in the side force and an accompanied small change in yaw angle of the trailer. For a thick fin, the separation point can migrate forward and back on each side of the fin and this can lead to a small yaw oscillation. By forcing separation at a fixed point forward of max thickness (with spoilers or other devices), the drag goes up a bit, but the oscillation in side force is eliminated. Vortex generators at max thickness or other aerodynamics widgets could provide a similar fix. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So should we put zigzag tape on the fin?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote on 12/24/2019 9:07 PM:
On Tuesday, December 24, 2019 at 9:06:36 AM UTC-6, Eric Greenwell wrote: Don Johnstone wrote on 12/24/2019 2:20 AM: At 15:35 23 December 2019, Eric Greenwell wrote: Don Johnstone wrote on 12/23/2019 1:36 AM: What is worth remembering is that the cause of the sway is aerodynamic. Loading, tyre pressure, fiction dampers can only ensure that the sway is damped out and does not increase. Trailers with less vertical surface area aft of the wheels suffer less from snaking than those with equal or greater vertical surface area behind the wheels. You may not be able to change the aerodynamics of the trailer but a good friction damper and proper loading will normally ensure that the snaking is damped. I have been a passenger in a car towing a Cobra trailer at over 100mph, scared the crap out of me but it was completely stable, but only when loaded with the glider. Empty it was a different story. How did you decide aerodynamics was the important factor, and not other factors like tongue length, tires, etc? That's counterintuitive and, for example, it's at significant variance with Nelson Funston's paper on towing glider trailers, which does not include aerodynamic factors. http://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/...wnload/779/737 From observation of driving trailers over many years. Aerodynamic forces are almost always the initial cause of the onset of snaking, the other factors take over in damping out, or increasing the initial disturbance. I can be towing at say 60mph in clear air. If I am overtaken, especially by a large vehicle I fist notice that as the vehicle is alongside the trailer is drawn towards the other vehicle, when the vehicle has passed the trailer moves away and this is where the snake starts. From that point on the other mentioned factors take over, which, almost without exception, we all use stabilisers, mostly ALKO type As you state, swaying typically starts with a "trigger" event, and crosswinds or large trucks are common triggers; however, it can also be a twitch on the steering wheel from inattention, dodging road debris, moving away from another vehicle drifting too close beside you, uneven road surfaces, higher speeds while passing another vehicle, etc. The trigger is not important, but the trailer's inherent stability is. On the other hand, there are reports of trailer aerodynamics directly affecting the trailer stability. The two I know about were both the older Komet style trailers with "doghouses" or "tail fins" that were airfoil shaped like vertical stabilizers without the rudder. Both owners reported significant reduction in swaying by putting "spoilers" near the leading edge on each side of the fin. The spoilers were about 1/2" high and a few inches back from the leading edge.. The now common Cobra trailers have blunt leading edges and flat, truncated trailing edges that apparently don't produce the lift the Komet fins did. My main concern is with trailer dynamics is safety, and for that, an aerodynamic disturbance can initiate a major oscillation that can be dangerous. Once started, the dynamics of the system is primary and aerodynamics is secondary. However, for comfort while towing, one would like to deal with small-amplitude oscillations that are not dangerous, just annoying. For this, aerodynamics is important. In general, fins near the back of the trailer could be useful, however, most lack the finesse of a good airfoil and will have some separation. They tend to have a larger than desired thickness to chord ratio, and the closure angle of airfoil to the trailing edge can also be high.. Both of these design 'features' can lead to separation on the sides of the fin. When separation occurs, it causes a change in the side force and an accompanied small change in yaw angle of the trailer. For a thick fin, the separation point can migrate forward and back on each side of the fin and this can lead to a small yaw oscillation. By forcing separation at a fixed point forward of max thickness (with spoilers or other devices), the drag goes up a bit, but the oscillation in side force is eliminated. Vortex generators at max thickness or other aerodynamics widgets could provide a similar fix. I did test my Cobra trailer with and without spoilers on the fin. I could not detect a difference in stability, suggesting to me the fin is producing insignificant lift when yawed. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, December 23, 2019 at 12:42:14 AM UTC-5, wrote:
Check out this technical paper (https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/porta...2/JAUTO981.pdf) This paper uses a model trailer with negligible aerodynamic characteristics. Caravans have enormous side areas, glider trailers usually less but with rear fins. So this paper is missing a rather important contributor to sway, which is the aero force accelerating the trailer back to center. Some glider owners have had good results reducing sway by fitting spoilers on the fin. Be careful out there, Best Regards, Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, December 23, 2019 at 9:48:13 AM UTC-6, Dave Nadler wrote:
On Monday, December 23, 2019 at 12:42:14 AM UTC-5, wrote: Check out this technical paper (https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/porta...2/JAUTO981.pdf) This paper uses a model trailer with negligible aerodynamic characteristics. Caravans have enormous side areas, glider trailers usually less but with rear fins. So this paper is missing a rather important contributor to sway, which is the aero force accelerating the trailer back to center. Some glider owners have had good results reducing sway by fitting spoilers on the fin. Be careful out there, Best Regards, Dave First of all, I'm an applied aerodynamicist who has designed wings for transonic business jets, so I do appreciate aerodynamics. However, when a trailer is swaying violently from side to side and the driver is trying to hold the steering wheel firm, aerodynamics is not the issue; it is the inertia of the system. An aerodynamic impulse from a gust or passing truck can start the oscillation, but once going, the aerodynamics are secondary. For regular operation at a safe margin below the critical towing speed, adding fins or removing sharp corners from the front of the trailer box may make the rig less twitchy, for instance less susceptible to irritating behavior in a sustained crosswind. My large aluminum box for the two-place, wood gliders is an excellent example of what not to do. It has sharp, swept corners up front that I am sure shed very nice sets of vortices that tend to impart a nice cyclic wiggle to the back end of the trailer. I've thought about putting a fin or two aft to help keep it pointed straight. But this is a low amplitude effect and never becomes a problem. What I am concerned about is behavior that could impact the safety of the rig. This is the lightly damped oscillation of a trailer near the critical towing speed. Once I get to that level, it is more like an undamped pendulum problem than an aerodynamic one. Tow safe so you can fly safe, ...... Neal |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do trailers with coil springs and shock absorbers sway at higher speeds? | son_of_flubber | Soaring | 35 | July 8th 14 10:30 PM |
Dual axle sway | glider[_2_] | Soaring | 7 | March 2nd 10 04:36 AM |
US - 2009 explorer - trailer sway control | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 1 | October 15th 08 06:27 AM |
Attention SkyLune: FAA To Fund Noise-mitigation Measures | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | July 8th 06 05:36 PM |
trailer sway | [email protected] | Soaring | 14 | June 19th 05 09:02 AM |