![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd rather take my chances on something that would accelerate the glider 0-50 knots in 50 meters with the FES running from the very start of the roll. This would increase available runway ahead for launch failure and conserve a bit of battery power. Fully automated with pilot pushing the go button..
How much runway do you need to self-launch a heavy two place FES when there is sink and windshear present? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd rather take my chances on something that would accelerate the glider 0-50 knots in 50 meters with the FES running from the very start of the roll. This would increase available runway ahead for launch failure and conserve a bit of battery power. Fully automated with pilot pushing the go button.
You just need to an old aircraft carrier catapult! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you ever seen an FES propeller extended?Â* There's no way I'd
attempt a launch either by air, auto, or winch with that prop spinning!Â* Now, a catapult launch might just work and it might just rip the landing gear off the ship. I wonder if Mark would post that video of the solar electric prototype glider model catapult test launch.Â* Hint:Â* The fuselage flew a short distance but the wings remained at the takeoff point. On 3/4/2020 11:22 PM, son_of_flubber wrote: I'd rather take my chances on something that would accelerate the glider 0-50 knots in 50 meters with the FES running from the very start of the roll. This would increase available runway ahead for launch failure and conserve a bit of battery power. Fully automated with pilot pushing the go button. How much runway do you need to self-launch a heavy two place FES when there is sink and windshear present? -- Dan, 5J |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bungees?Â* We don't need no stinking bungees!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbRAqPxd49E On 3/5/2020 8:47 AM, Mike N. wrote: Well with the right hill and some head wind... https://youtu.be/zdCGb9-vjck -- Dan, 5J |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a snow skier, I think that is quite cool. All that site needs is a rope tow back to the top of the hill... ðŸ˜
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More on topic, Paul's original post seems to have the most practical solution.
Auto towing of an FES glider to a safe height to either fly out on FES power or allowing a safe return to the field, seems a great and practical solution. Consider soaring sites at small airfields with neither tow plane or winch available. Bring your glider to the site with your tow vehicle, then auto tow using the same vehicle. Think of the potential for flying from small sites. No offense Paul, but maybe a mini winch for FES launching is a solution looking for a problem. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/5/20 3:44 PM, Mike N. wrote:
More on topic, Paul's original post seems to have the most practical solution. Auto towing of an FES glider to a safe height to either fly out on FES power or allowing a safe return to the field, seems a great and practical solution. Not a great solution. Fes gliders aren't known for having any large reserves of power, so using a chunk of it to reach a reasonable height is going to leave little for a self-retrieve. Consider soaring sites at small airfields with neither tow plane or winch available. Bring your glider to the site with your tow vehicle, then auto tow using the same vehicle. Think of the potential for flying from small sites. No offense Paul, but maybe a mini winch for FES launching is a solution looking for a problem. Here's an idea, how about buying an actual self-launch glider, something that was designed, tested, and certified for the job?? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 15:47 05 March 2020, Mike N. wrote:
Well with the right hill and some head wind... https://youtu.be/zdCGb9-vjck Slightly more on Paul's original topic, at the site where the bungee clip was shot (Long Mynd in UK) on slightly less windy days, they winch launch to around 300' straight onto the hill. No 'Mini-Winch' though - they use a standard, full power Skylaunch winch, which the also use on their longer runs when the wind is not on the hill. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGeUFJUQlaQ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, March 5, 2020 at 1:22:48 AM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
I'd rather take my chances on something that would accelerate the glider 0-50 knots in 50 meters with the FES running from the very start of the roll. This would increase available runway ahead for launch failure and conserve a bit of battery power. Fully automated with pilot pushing the go button. This is really the idea right here. As we increasingly embrace self-launch eGliders, I think we'll see more and more gliders operating out of small airports without the benefit of a club. Thus, what's missing in the conversation is a consideration of the CONOPS (CONcept of OPerationS) for single-person launching. Gliders have a major limitation in requiring a team to get a single pilot airborne. Having a catapult, which terminates before the runway begins, would get the plane airborne without requiring outside help. It could be semi-permanently installed and not require setup or teardown. The energy needed to accelerate a 300kg plane to 25m/s fits in a battery the size of a tangerine. When the planes are reported as typically using only 20% of their packs to go fly, I feel this tells us that the major risk isn't climb out, it's takeoff. Ignoring the risk imparted by the catapult, there are several consequent risk reductions: 1) At a 10% climb grade, a catapult on a 3000' runway would allow a plane to reach 100' with 2000' of runway to spare. An engine failure suddenly becomes a very easy straight-ahead recovery. Contrast this to a more leisurely ground roll on grass which eats up 1000' and where an engine failure at 100' is a real cause for sphincter puckering. 2) For FES-style systems, the prop can be started once off the ground, eliminating the possibility of a ground strike 3) No chance of ripping the wings off the plane due to an over-exuberant winch operation 4) Reduced chance of ground-looping on roll-out, esp. in cross-wind scenarios. 5) Everything that goes wrong goes wrong at low altitude at low speeds 6) Does not impact the runway or leave anything on or near the runway Relatedly, any kind of automated winch or autotow system requires serious thought about what to do with the launch system once the pilot flies away. A catapult doesn't have this problem since it is installed before the threshold. I'm not saying getting the catapult right would be easy, but it definitely has a different operational spec than a winch or autotow. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LX Mini Map | Andrew Blanchard | Soaring | 36 | March 8th 14 04:07 AM |
Mini-Imp | Curt Fennell | Home Built | 7 | November 10th 09 12:43 PM |
Best winch metrics - what is the best winch operationally? | Bruce | Soaring | 19 | July 19th 09 11:45 AM |
LIppmann reports a 950 meter winch launch with their Dynatec winch line - anything higher? | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 20 | December 27th 04 12:33 AM |
Mini Imp | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 3 | December 17th 03 05:56 AM |