![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As Daniel says, flying a declared flight is a worthwhile goal and should be rewarded with some recognition.
With computers and the internet, processing a large volume of flights really isn't an issue. A state record keeper should be able to handle "non-record" flights without too much trouble, especially since it would really just be to unofficially validate the flight. We could then have a reset at any time for these lesser, but still significant flights. Many more pilots will be able to participate since each year they have a chance to be #1 for a particular task. Everyone - pilots, OOs, and record keepers will be kept up to date on the process. So when a new record is actually flown, everyone will be in practice. The whole process could even be automated with online submission. Just need someone to keep an eye on it and deal with bad or problem claims by either pushing them through or providing feedback to the pilot and OO. 5Z I set a few youth records in AZ back in 1979 and they're still there! Actually, it looks like no much new action there since the 1980's. Lots of empty slots. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm reminded of the "string board" we had on the wall at Black Forest
Soaring Society back in the '90s.Â* At the end of the day, if one was proud of his flight, he'd stick pins in the wall map and connect them with a piece of string.Â* Everyone could see it, admire it, rag on it, get ideas, set goals for next weekend, etc.Â* It was fun, but there were no extra chicks. If you want money and chicks, you should take up golf.Â* It worked for Tiger, didn't it? On 4/18/2020 9:55 PM, 5Z wrote: As Daniel says, flying a declared flight is a worthwhile goal and should be rewarded with some recognition. With computers and the internet, processing a large volume of flights really isn't an issue. A state record keeper should be able to handle "non-record" flights without too much trouble, especially since it would really just be to unofficially validate the flight. We could then have a reset at any time for these lesser, but still significant flights. Many more pilots will be able to participate since each year they have a chance to be #1 for a particular task. Everyone - pilots, OOs, and record keepers will be kept up to date on the process. So when a new record is actually flown, everyone will be in practice. The whole process could even be automated with online submission. Just need someone to keep an eye on it and deal with bad or problem claims by either pushing them through or providing feedback to the pilot and OO. 5Z I set a few youth records in AZ back in 1979 and they're still there! Actually, it looks like no much new action there since the 1980's. Lots of empty slots. -- Dan, 5J |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Task declaration validity with 302 for US state records | [email protected] | Soaring | 7 | August 3rd 14 02:09 AM |
SSA State & Nat Records Rules Conflict | noel.wade | Soaring | 18 | September 30th 10 05:32 AM |
US pilots-State Soaring Records since 1 October 2007 | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | July 31st 08 10:54 PM |
State and National records question | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 3 | January 22nd 07 11:14 PM |
OHIO state records? Keeper? | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | May 4th 05 05:53 PM |