A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Minimum acceptable self-launch climb rate



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 27th 20, 07:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kinsell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Minimum acceptable self-launch climb rate

On 4/26/20 11:38 AM, Kenz Dale wrote:


The GP 15 Jeta has a ratio of 1:6.3, which is far lower than the rule of thumb for powered flight. Yet, I don't hear anyone complaining.


Given that there are approximately 0 Jeta's flying in the hands of real
customers, the lack of complaints may not be surprising.

You should always be cautious comparing specs of vapourware gliders to
those of gliders in the field, since in the first case the glossy
brochures are sometimes not encumbered by nasty things called facts.

-Dave
  #2  
Old April 27th 20, 02:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Minimum acceptable self-launch climb rate

kinsell wrote on 4/26/2020 11:37 PM:
On 4/26/20 11:38 AM, Kenz Dale wrote:


The GP 15 Jeta has a ratio of 1:6.3, which is far lower than the rule of thumb
for powered flight. Yet, I don't hear anyone complaining.


Given that there are approximately 0 Jeta's flying in the hands of real customers,
the lack of complaints may not be surprising.

You should always be cautious comparing specs of vapourware gliders to those of
gliders in the field, since in the first case the glossy brochures are sometimes
not encumbered by nasty things called facts.


The first one was at the SSA convention, then taken to it's new home in Oregon.
The virus situation has complicated and delayed the licensing, but the owner
expects to fly "soon". The factory (and many other businesses) in Poland has been
locked down (and still is) for over a month, which has delayed the April delivery
of the next two units to the USA, and that delay will likely ripple through the
other orders for many months. The prototype has flown for at least two years.

Bringing a new glider to market on time is difficult, even for established
manufacturers. 25 years ago, Schleicher surprised both myself and the US dealer
when they added a year to the delivery date for my ASH26E.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me)
- "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation"
https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimum rates of climb/descent for VFR Mxsmanic Piloting 113 February 17th 08 06:42 AM
Why Isn't Vx The Best Rate Of Climb? RandyL Piloting 18 September 28th 06 07:50 PM
figuring Rate of Climb Michael Horowitz Home Built 1 June 19th 05 03:16 AM
Rate of climb Dillon Pyron Home Built 3 May 8th 04 01:08 PM
Minimum rate of climb or descent Aaron Kahn Instrument Flight Rules 3 July 25th 03 03:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.