![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Even by 1940, the world's air forces had discovered that there was a problem with the more-powerful engines that were coming on line: they'd drive the propeller too fast. Once the tips go trans-sonic, the prop loses efficiency. So they went from two-bladed to three-bladed props, and then to four-bladed. And they made the props longer. But there are limits to both these solutions. Thus the notion of having two sets of propellers, rotating in different directions. On prop-jets these days, you routinely see multi-bladed propellers.I'm not sure why airframe manufacturers didn't go in this direction for warplanes, but perhaps it has to do with the power output of a plane under combat conditions--that is, a seven-bladed prop will work on a transport but not on a fighter. Dunno. You're certainly right about the complexity of the counter- or contra-rotating propellers. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aero Composites Propellers | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 26 | June 18th 04 05:30 AM |
FS Performance Propellers 60 x 66 | Sammy | Home Built | 0 | December 19th 03 01:51 AM |
Performance Propellers 60 x 66 | Sam Hoskins | Home Built | 0 | December 10th 03 01:03 AM |
Wooden Propellers | Dick Petersen | Home Built | 5 | November 13th 03 12:41 AM |