![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, June 5, 2020 at 1:26:21 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Good and cheap are mutually exclusive. A good, safe machine won't be cheap. Right, but I thought the idea of the original question was to see if sacrificing some good (higher than 300 foot tow?) might make cheap and safe possible. Seems like a small corner case until there are lots more FES, but still fun to think about. Agreed! It's a fun thought experiment for a growing sector of the sport. For me, the issue is that if I have a setup which can get me to 300', it can get me a lot higher for minimal extra effort. 300' would mean about 600' of linear space, which is unlikely to fit in the area before a runway. So once I'm using any part of the runway, I might was well use the entire length. From a mechanical perspective, the only substantial difference between 300' and 3000' is the length of rope and the total energy required. The angles, forces, and power stays the same. Some crucial distinctions of a 100' long catapult-style launch are that there's no hardware on the runway so it can plausibly be completely autonomous; the angles are purely horizontal so the spooling system is simplified and the hook cannot drift down onto the runway; a 3 second launch means that motor cooling is not an issue due to the thermal mass of the motor; and a launch failure is very graceful, with a worst case result of rolling down the runway at a leisurely 30-40kts. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:00:11 -0700, sebesta wrote:
On Friday, June 5, 2020 at 1:26:21 PM UTC-4, wrote: Good and cheap are mutually exclusive. A good, safe machine won't be cheap. Right, but I thought the idea of the original question was to see if sacrificing some good (higher than 300 foot tow?) might make cheap and safe possible. Seems like a small corner case until there are lots more FES, but still fun to think about. Agreed! It's a fun thought experiment for a growing sector of the sport. For me, the issue is that if I have a setup which can get me to 300', it can get me a lot higher for minimal extra effort. 300' would mean about 600' of linear space, which is unlikely to fit in the area before a runway. So once I'm using any part of the runway, I might was well use the entire length. The rule of thumb over here is that you get to 1/3 of the cable length, not 1/2, but it depends on wind too. Our Skylaunch (around 400 hp from V8 on LPG and 1000m (3270 ft) of cable gets me to 1200ft on a light breeze and 1400 ft plus in more normal summer weather with a reasonable wind gradient (Std Libelle, not pulling hard, so around 1/2.5 of line length on average. A low power winch won't do nearly as well. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LX Mini Map | Andrew Blanchard | Soaring | 36 | March 8th 14 04:07 AM |
Mini-Imp | Curt Fennell | Home Built | 7 | November 10th 09 12:43 PM |
Best winch metrics - what is the best winch operationally? | Bruce | Soaring | 19 | July 19th 09 11:45 AM |
LIppmann reports a 950 meter winch launch with their Dynatec winch line - anything higher? | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 20 | December 27th 04 12:33 AM |
Mini Imp | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 3 | December 17th 03 05:56 AM |