A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VNE vs altitude: glider specs vs rules of thumb



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 8th 20, 10:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bret Hess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default VNE vs altitude: glider specs vs rules of thumb

On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 1:27:57 PM UTC-6, Andy Blackburn wrote:

TAS vs IAS does increase at about 2% per 1,000 ft


Although looking at the data of the protocol and the glider specs, it's really closer to 1.4% per 1000 ft. Certainly 2% is easier to use and 1% is too little. The "10Kft, 2% rule" kind of splits the error. V is too high at 10K and too low at 40Kft. I have to say while it's not accurate enough for the table I will make for my glider, it's a good rule of thumb for on-the-fly estimates.
  #2  
Old June 9th 20, 03:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Matt Herron Jr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default VNE vs altitude: glider specs vs rules of thumb

On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 2:41:56 PM UTC-7, Bret Hess wrote:
On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 1:27:57 PM UTC-6, Andy Blackburn wrote:

TAS vs IAS does increase at about 2% per 1,000 ft


Although looking at the data of the protocol and the glider specs, it's really closer to 1.4% per 1000 ft. Certainly 2% is easier to use and 1% is too little. The "10Kft, 2% rule" kind of splits the error. V is too high at 10K and too low at 40Kft. I have to say while it's not accurate enough for the table I will make for my glider, it's a good rule of thumb for on-the-fly estimates.


The difference between 1.4% and 2.0% is a dangerous place to play...
  #3  
Old June 9th 20, 04:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bret Hess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default VNE vs altitude: glider specs vs rules of thumb

The glider specs use 1.4%, so it's neither play nor dangerous.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft Tom Kelley #711 Soaring 15 September 5th 17 03:54 PM
Rules for Logging Glider PIC Time Markus Graeber Soaring 7 January 8th 12 12:30 AM
Rules of Thumb for Cross-Country Flying Roy Clark, \B6\ Soaring 1 October 17th 08 01:42 PM
Glider Altitude (Record?) over Mt. Everest [email protected] Soaring 2 January 19th 06 02:26 PM
Best Glider for Altitude Record Attempt? Jerome Conners Soaring 24 December 17th 03 10:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.