A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pearl Harbor Defense



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 04, 04:37 PM
denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub

Of course, people also envisioned an attack on the Panama Canal and
New York City. After the attack, whether it's Pearl Harbor or the
World Trade Center, the conspiracy buffs trot out the clear trail of
warning that *any fool* would have noticed. It seems very obvious to
us now that the Japanese would attack Hawaii. It didn't seem obvious
in December 1941.

(What was obvious was that they would attack Malaya, Indonesia, and
the Philippines. Nobody there was prepared, either. And if somebody
was, little good it did him.)


Yeah Right,a conspiracy but a very typical Anglo conspiracy.
They got first definite warning about that in case of hostilities with
Japan Pearl Harbor would be the first target on Jan.27,41.
Afterwards they received hundreds more including intercepted JN-25B
messages.

BTW do the names like Roosevelt,Stimson,Marshall,Hull etc sound like
German-American,Irish-American ,Italian or Hispanic-American names?


"as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society ,it may find
it more difficult to fashion on foreign policy issues except in the
circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external
threat"

Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1997.


The creation of such truly massive and widely perceived direct
external threats is the job of the Members of the Anglo minority who
govern US .

It was true in 1941 it was also true in 2001.
  #2  
Old September 21st 04, 06:14 PM
Peter Twydell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , denyav
writes
Cub

Of course, people also envisioned an attack on the Panama Canal and
New York City. After the attack, whether it's Pearl Harbor or the
World Trade Center, the conspiracy buffs trot out the clear trail of
warning that *any fool* would have noticed. It seems very obvious to
us now that the Japanese would attack Hawaii. It didn't seem obvious
in December 1941.

(What was obvious was that they would attack Malaya, Indonesia, and
the Philippines. Nobody there was prepared, either. And if somebody
was, little good it did him.)


Yeah Right,a conspiracy but a very typical Anglo conspiracy.
They got first definite warning about that in case of hostilities with
Japan Pearl Harbor would be the first target on Jan.27,41.
Afterwards they received hundreds more including intercepted JN-25B
messages.

BTW do the names like Roosevelt,Stimson,Marshall,Hull etc sound like
German-American,Irish-American ,Italian or Hispanic-American names?


Your ignorance transcends your idiocy and racism. "Roosevelt" is a Dutch
name, like Stuyvesant, Van Buren, Brooklyn (Breukelen), Yonkers
(Jonkheren), etc., etc. How does that fit in with your batty theories of
"Anglo" (whatever the hell that means) conspiracy.

What is it with you, anyway? Some good-looking Englishman steal your
girl friend?

"as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society ,it may find
it more difficult to fashion on foreign policy issues except in the
circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external
threat"

Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1997.


The creation of such truly massive and widely perceived direct
external threats is the job of the Members of the Anglo minority who
govern US .

It was true in 1941 it was also true in 2001.


Do you mean it was as true in 2001 as it was in 1941, i.e. not at all,
except in your fevered little brain cell? I wish I had an imagination as
active as yours.

Keep up the good work, it gives us a good laugh from time to time.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!
  #3  
Old September 21st 04, 06:59 PM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Do you mean it was as true in 2001 as it was in 1941, i.e. not at all,
except in your fevered little brain cell? I wish I had an imagination as
active as yours.


You dont need to ,even a third grader can understand what Brzezinski meant.

Anglos were both in 1941 and 2001 a minority in US population.(if you are
interested German-Americans make up biggest single ethnic group in US,ffollowed
by Irish-Americans)but fully dominated decision making platforms both in 1941
and 2001.

So if an ethnic group wants to rule a big country , they need either
Republican Guard divisions manned by the members of ruling ethnic and/or
religious group or if you cannot do that, PSYOPs that gives the impression that
the US under massive external threat.

Keep up the good work, it gives us a good laugh from time to time.
--


Good Luck to all Anglos including our minority Anglos as well as to Anglos in
Anglo homeland and in Australia.

Anglo" (whatever the hell that means) conspiracy.


Meaning of Anglo? Well you should check out works and deeds of great British
Statesman Lord Rhodes.

You know all of our Presidents are either Rhodes scholars or certified by
Boston Brahmins.
  #6  
Old September 22nd 04, 07:50 AM
Peter Twydell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Denyav
writes
Do you mean it was as true in 2001 as it was in 1941, i.e. not at all,
except in your fevered little brain cell? I wish I had an imagination as
active as yours.


You dont need to ,even a third grader can understand what Brzezinski meant.

Perhaps, but I have no idea what you mean. Or even what ZB said.

Anglos were both in 1941 and 2001 a minority in US population.(if you are
interested German-Americans make up biggest single ethnic group in US,ffollowed
by Irish-Americans)but fully dominated decision making platforms both in 1941
and 2001.

Does the average American really care much about people's ethnic
background? Or only the paranoid, such as yourself?

So if an ethnic group wants to rule a big country , they need either
Republican Guard divisions manned by the members of ruling ethnic and/or
religious group or if you cannot do that, PSYOPs that gives the impression that
the US under massive external threat.

What?

Keep up the good work, it gives us a good laugh from time to time.
--


Good Luck to all Anglos including our minority Anglos as well as to Anglos in
Anglo homeland and in Australia.

What _are_ you talking about?

Anglo" (whatever the hell that means) conspiracy.


Meaning of Anglo? Well you should check out works and deeds of great British
Statesman Lord Rhodes.

Who? If you mean Cecil Rhodes, he was many things, but never a Lord.
Your credibility, minuscule as it is, is diminished further by your lack
of accuracy.

Is an Anglo someone of purely* English ancestry, such as Washington? Is
a Scot like Polk classed as an Anglo? What about the Irish connection:
JFK and Reagan?

*Do you have any idea how the English came to be?

You know all of our Presidents are either Rhodes scholars or certified by
Boston Brahmins.


I know no such thing. I have never given such considerations a moment's
thought.

If you think that Rhodes Scholarships are an Anglo-American conspiracy,
why did they originally include Germans?


Nice bit of snipping of the preceding post, BTW. It's all right, you
don't have to apologise for making a mistake and calling the Roosevelts
"Anglos", we wouldn't like you to do anything that's out of character.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!
  #7  
Old September 22nd 04, 06:02 PM
denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


You dont need to ,even a third grader can understand what Brzezinski meant.

Perhaps, but I have no idea what you mean. Or even what ZB said.


Interesting,I think ZBs words need not much clarification,they are
very clear.
I dont understand why smart people start playing dumb when faced with
clear but implicating statements.


Does the average American really care much about people's ethnic
background? Or only the paranoid, such as yourself?


You are right,over 80% percent of American people do not care about
peoples ethnic background,but the problem is that the Anglo minority
that make up less than 20% of population but fully control US,they
care very much about ethnicity.While they openly advocate that
etnicity should not be a factor in US,(if ethnicity would be
factor,Anglo minority could not fully control US) and try to supress
the importance of the importance of heritage for the other ethnic
groups,behind closed doors they practice racism and make plans to keep
US under Anglo control.
Those who are old enough will remember signs like that "Help
Wanted,Irish do not need to apply" or stories of excelent Jewish
students that dared to apply to the top Anglo higher education
instutitions in US.
Anglos have recovered US after 1872,this time without using RN but
using much more subtle but much more effective methods

Rhodes wrote "Why should we form a secret society with but one object
the furtherance British Empire and the bringing of whole uncivilised
world under British rule for the recovery of United States for making
the Anglo-Saxon RACE but ONE empire".

He succeded.period.


So if an ethnic group wants to rule a big country , they need either
Republican Guard divisions manned by the members of ruling ethnic and/or
religious group or if you cannot do that, PSYOPs that gives the impression that
the US under massive external threat.

What?


I think you still have difficulty in understanding Brzezinskis words.

Keep up the good work, it gives us a good laugh from time to time.
--


Good Luck to all Anglos including our minority Anglos as well as to Anglos in
Anglo homeland and in Australia.

They,specially Anglos in Anglo homeland will need good luck in future.


Anglo" (whatever the hell that means) conspiracy.


Meaning of Anglo? Well you should check out works and deeds of great British
Statesman Lord Rhodes.

Who? If you mean Cecil Rhodes, he was many things, but never a Lord.
Your credibility, minuscule as it is, is diminished further by your lack
of accuracy.

Is an Anglo someone of purely* English ancestry, such as Washington? Is
a Scot like Polk classed as an Anglo? What about the Irish connection:
JFK and Reagan?

*Do you have any idea how the English came to be?

You know all of our Presidents are either Rhodes scholars or certified by
Boston Brahmins.


I know no such thing. I have never given such considerations a moment's
thought.

If you think that Rhodes Scholarships are an Anglo-American conspiracy,
why did they originally include Germans?


Nice bit of snipping of the preceding post, BTW. It's all right, you
don't have to apologise for making a mistake and calling the Roosevelts
"Anglos", we wouldn't like you to do anything that's out of character


To be a part of Anglo conspiracy you dont need to be an ethnic
Anglo,some become a part of it even without realizing it,some become a
part of it for personal gains.

Lets name it sir,Pearl Harbor,Northwoods and 9/11 were not planned by
Germans,Jews,Hispanics,Irish or Arabs,they were both Anglo
operations,designed to provide broad Public support behind ruling
Anglo minority.

"United we stand"
Translation: "if we unite behind our Anglo rulers we stand"
  #8  
Old September 22nd 04, 06:49 PM
Peter Twydell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , denyav
writes

You dont need to ,even a third grader can understand what Brzezinski meant.

Perhaps, but I have no idea what you mean. Or even what ZB said.


Interesting,I think ZBs words need not much clarification,they are
very clear.
I dont understand why smart people start playing dumb when faced with
clear but implicating statements.

I don't know how many ways there are of conveying to you that I have no
idea what ZB said in this context. It's no use banging on about it
without telling me what you're talking about.

Does the average American really care much about people's ethnic
background? Or only the paranoid, such as yourself?


You are right,over 80% percent of American people do not care about
peoples ethnic background,but the problem is that the Anglo minority
that make up less than 20% of population but fully control US,they
care very much about ethnicity.While they openly advocate that
etnicity should not be a factor in US,(if ethnicity would be
factor,Anglo minority could not fully control US) and try to supress
the importance of the importance of heritage for the other ethnic
groups,behind closed doors they practice racism and make plans to keep
US under Anglo control.
Those who are old enough will remember signs like that "Help
Wanted,Irish do not need to apply" or stories of excelent Jewish
students that dared to apply to the top Anglo higher education
instutitions in US.
Anglos have recovered US after 1872,this time without using RN but
using much more subtle but much more effective methods

Rhodes wrote "Why should we form a secret society with but one object
the furtherance British Empire and the bringing of whole uncivilised
world under British rule for the recovery of United States for making
the Anglo-Saxon RACE but ONE empire".

He succeded.period.


Lots of babble but very little sense. If you live in an English-speaking
(and I bet that ****es you off) country, at least make an effort to use
the language comprehensibly. Your arguments, such as they are, are lost
in a non-grammatical morass of syntactical gobbledegook.

So if an ethnic group wants to rule a big country , they need either
Republican Guard divisions manned by the members of ruling ethnic and/or
religious group or if you cannot do that, PSYOPs that gives the
impression that
the US under massive external threat.

What?


I think you still have difficulty in understanding Brzezinskis words.


See above. Even if I knew what his words were, which I don't, they'd
probably be more comprehensible than yours.

Keep up the good work, it gives us a good laugh from time to time.
--

Good Luck to all Anglos including our minority Anglos as well as to
Anglos in
Anglo homeland and in Australia.

They,specially Anglos in Anglo homeland will need good luck in future.


Anglo" (whatever the hell that means) conspiracy.


Meaning of Anglo? Well you should check out works and deeds of great British
Statesman Lord Rhodes.

Who? If you mean Cecil Rhodes, he was many things, but never a Lord.
Your credibility, minuscule as it is, is diminished further by your lack
of accuracy.

Is an Anglo someone of purely* English ancestry, such as Washington? Is
a Scot like Polk classed as an Anglo? What about the Irish connection:
JFK and Reagan?

Answer the question (if you can)

*Do you have any idea how the English came to be?

Answer the question (if you can)

You know all of our Presidents are either Rhodes scholars or certified by
Boston Brahmins.


I know no such thing. I have never given such considerations a moment's
thought.

If you think that Rhodes Scholarships are an Anglo-American conspiracy,
why did they originally include Germans?

Answer the question (if you can)

Nice bit of snipping of the preceding post, BTW. It's all right, you
don't have to apologise for making a mistake and calling the Roosevelts
"Anglos", we wouldn't like you to do anything that's out of character


To be a part of Anglo conspiracy you dont need to be an ethnic
Anglo,some become a part of it even without realizing it,some become a
part of it for personal gains.

I've obviously missed out somewhere, because despite having links to
religious groups, the police, the armed services, charities, medical
services, broadcasting and business, and having family, friends and
business contacts in 11 or so countries, nobody has ever invited me to
be part of the conspiracy. Not even the Freemasons or the Rotary Club.

Perhaps that just proves your conspiracy theory: the absence of direct
proof or personal experience just shows how effective the conspiracy is!

Lets name it sir,Pearl Harbor,Northwoods and 9/11 were not planned by
Germans,Jews,Hispanics,Irish or Arabs,they were both Anglo
operations,designed to provide broad Public support behind ruling
Anglo minority.

Very clever of the "Anglos" to persuade all those Saudis to perpetrate
9/11. If the "Anglos" are that good, then they DESERVE to rule the world
(again).

"United we stand"
Translation: "if we unite behind our Anglo rulers we stand"


We stand where? Do you understand what "United we stand" means?
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!
  #9  
Old September 22nd 04, 07:53 PM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't know how many ways there are of conveying to you that I have no
idea what ZB said in this context. It's no use banging on about it
without telling me what you're talking about.


Then you must read Brzezinskis book titled "Grand Chessboard".

Lots of babble but very little sense. If you live in an English-speaking
(and I bet that ****es you off) country, at least make an effort to use
the language comprehensibly. Your arguments, such as they are, are lost
in a non-grammatical morass of


Apparently you are experiencing difficulties in understanding of Rhodes' words
too.
BTW why a country with less than 20% Anglo population should be forced to nake
English the official language?

Is the language alone not one of the main tools of Anglo Empire building
process?


English ancestry, such as Washington? Is
a Scot like Polk classed as an Anglo? What about the Irish connection:
JFK and Reagan?

Answer the question (if you can)


Well,there were only two presidents that got the job without approval of Boston
Brahmins ,JFK and Nixon,the first one got killed after he killed Operation
Northwoods the latter one (politically) got killed after he killed
Bretton-Woods.period.

The president wanna be that Anglos hated most was Gore,closely followed by
Dean.

I've obviously missed out somewhere, because despite having links to
religious groups, the police, the armed services, charities, medical
services, broadcasting and business, and having family, friends and
business contacts in 11 or so countries, nobody has ever invited me e part of

the conspiracy. Not even the Freemasons or the Rotary Club.

Are you sure?

Perhaps that just proves your conspiracy theory: the absence of direct
proof or personal experience just shows how effective the conspiracy is!


Dont forget some people become the part of the even without realizing it,so
others for personal gains.

Very clever of the "Anglos" to persuade all those Saudis to perpetrate
9/11. If the "Anglos" are that good, then they DESERVE to rule the world
(again).


Dont you know how Anglos play the "Great Game"?

First game area selected then proxies not other way around.

So if the the game area selected populated predominanly by muslims then your
proxy must be an islamic terrorist organization.

If game area were Cuba then cuban terrorists would be the natural choice.

BTW no operative of any intel agency identifies him/herself to any terrorist
organization as such.
Saudis that piloted 9/11 planes probably did not even now for whom they were
working.

We stand where? Do you understand what "United we stand" means?
--


I think I know pretty well.
Do you know why these signs popped up everywhere in US after 9/11?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Remember Pearl Harbor: Special Program Tonight at EAA Fitzair4 Home Built 0 December 7th 04 07:40 PM
For Keith Willshaw... robert arndt Military Aviation 253 July 6th 04 05:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.