A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GET SOME! Bush is Toast



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 04, 06:50 PM
Guinnog65
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"B2431" wrote in message
...

(snip defensive pro US stuff)

Getting rid of Hussein was a good thing. The other freedoms you refer to
will not count for much until or unless there is law and order and an end
to
killing.


If everything settles down in 6 months and Iraq is at peace will you come
back
and tell us the U.S. did a good thing?


Oh yes. No problem. And if green men come and ask me to take them to my
leader, I'll be prepared for that too!

It is a reflection on how things have gone since the invasion that
so many Iraqis will support the terrorists. It is a worse one that many
Iraqis actually regret the passing of Hussein. If that isn't a vote of no
confidence, what is it?


OK, let's revisit another war for a moment. The vast majority of the
Soviet
populace hated Stalin. Many initially welcomed Hitler's invasion. Almost
to a
person the Soviets banded together to expel and invader. This happens in
almost
every invaded country situation. Look at the coalition that expelled Sadam
from
Kuwait and how nations that didn't get along with each other did so for
the
cause.


Wow! So you are comparing the US forces with the Wehrmacht? And you call
*me* anti-American! (I am not, btw, I am anti this illegal invasion)

They do have the same helmets I suppose...


  #2  
Old September 21st 04, 08:24 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Guinnog65" lid
Date: 9/21/2004 12:50 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"B2431" wrote in message
...

(snip defensive pro US stuff)

Good, and you also snipped your own uninformed commentary.


Getting rid of Hussein was a good thing. The other freedoms you refer to
will not count for much until or unless there is law and order and an end
to
killing.


If everything settles down in 6 months and Iraq is at peace will you come
back
and tell us the U.S. did a good thing?


Oh yes. No problem. And if green men come and ask me to take them to my
leader, I'll be prepared for that too!

It is a reflection on how things have gone since the invasion that
so many Iraqis will support the terrorists. It is a worse one that many
Iraqis actually regret the passing of Hussein. If that isn't a vote of no
confidence, what is it?


OK, let's revisit another war for a moment. The vast majority of the
Soviet
populace hated Stalin. Many initially welcomed Hitler's invasion. Almost
to a
person the Soviets banded together to expel and invader. This happens in
almost
every invaded country situation. Look at the coalition that expelled Sadam
from
Kuwait and how nations that didn't get along with each other did so for
the
cause.


Wow! So you are comparing the US forces with the Wehrmacht?


Did I say that? I was comparing the Soviet reaction to the invasion.


And you call
*me* anti-American! (I am not, btw, I am anti this illegal invasion)


The invasion was perfectly legal since sadam defied a dozen UN resolutions,
abrogated his own agreements with the U.S. and had consistanly been shooting at
U.S. and British aircraft that were enforcing the no fly zones sadam agreed
to.


They do have the same helmets I suppose...


The helmets don't even look anything alike.
Nice try.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #3  
Old September 21st 04, 09:50 PM
Guinnog65
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Guinnog65" lid
Date: 9/21/2004 12:50 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"B2431" wrote in message
...

(snip defensive pro US stuff)

Good, and you also snipped your own uninformed commentary.


Getting rid of Hussein was a good thing. The other freedoms you refer to
will not count for much until or unless there is law and order and an
end
to
killing.

If everything settles down in 6 months and Iraq is at peace will you
come
back
and tell us the U.S. did a good thing?


Oh yes. No problem. And if green men come and ask me to take them to my
leader, I'll be prepared for that too!

It is a reflection on how things have gone since the invasion that
so many Iraqis will support the terrorists. It is a worse one that many
Iraqis actually regret the passing of Hussein. If that isn't a vote of
no
confidence, what is it?

OK, let's revisit another war for a moment. The vast majority of the
Soviet
populace hated Stalin. Many initially welcomed Hitler's invasion. Almost
to a
person the Soviets banded together to expel and invader. This happens in
almost
every invaded country situation. Look at the coalition that expelled
Sadam
from
Kuwait and how nations that didn't get along with each other did so for
the
cause.


Wow! So you are comparing the US forces with the Wehrmacht?


Did I say that? I was comparing the Soviet reaction to the invasion.


So you would consider the Iraqis the invaders? In their own country? A
somewht unusual way of looking at things!

And you call
*me* anti-American! (I am not, btw, I am anti this illegal invasion)


The invasion was perfectly legal since sadam defied a dozen UN
resolutions,
abrogated his own agreements with the U.S. and had consistanly been
shooting at
U.S. and British aircraft that were enforcing the no fly zones sadam
agreed
to.


Not a point of view shared by Kofi Annan of the UN. Nor by the majority of
people I talk to.

There was a thing mentioned a lot at the time of the war about WMDs. Now
that this justification for the war has turned out to be false, do you still
have no problem at all about the war's legality?

They do have the same helmets I suppose...


The helmets don't even look anything alike.


I think they look very similar. And like alot of the Nazi kit, it was a very
good design.

Nice try.


Thank you!


  #4  
Old September 21st 04, 10:36 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Guinnog65" lid
Date: 9/21/2004 3:50 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Guinnog65"
lid
Date: 9/21/2004 12:50 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"B2431" wrote in message
...

(snip defensive pro US stuff)

Good, and you also snipped your own uninformed commentary.


Getting rid of Hussein was a good thing. The other freedoms you refer to
will not count for much until or unless there is law and order and an
end
to
killing.

If everything settles down in 6 months and Iraq is at peace will you
come
back
and tell us the U.S. did a good thing?

Oh yes. No problem. And if green men come and ask me to take them to my
leader, I'll be prepared for that too!

It is a reflection on how things have gone since the invasion that
so many Iraqis will support the terrorists. It is a worse one that many
Iraqis actually regret the passing of Hussein. If that isn't a vote of
no
confidence, what is it?

OK, let's revisit another war for a moment. The vast majority of the
Soviet
populace hated Stalin. Many initially welcomed Hitler's invasion. Almost
to a
person the Soviets banded together to expel and invader. This happens in
almost
every invaded country situation. Look at the coalition that expelled
Sadam
from
Kuwait and how nations that didn't get along with each other did so for
the
cause.

Wow! So you are comparing the US forces with the Wehrmacht?


Did I say that? I was comparing the Soviet reaction to the invasion.


So you would consider the Iraqis the invaders? In their own country? A
somewht unusual way of looking at things!


Since you insist on not reading what I wrote this discussion is closed.

And you call
*me* anti-American! (I am not, btw, I am anti this illegal invasion)


The invasion was perfectly legal since sadam defied a dozen UN
resolutions,
abrogated his own agreements with the U.S. and had consistanly been
shooting at
U.S. and British aircraft that were enforcing the no fly zones sadam
agreed
to.


Not a point of view shared by Kofi Annan of the UN. Nor by the majority of
people I talk to.

There was a thing mentioned a lot at the time of the war about WMDs. Now
that this justification for the war has turned out to be false, do you still
have no problem at all about the war's legality?

They do have the same helmets I suppose...


The helmets don't even look anything alike.


I think they look very similar. And like alot of the Nazi kit, it was a very
good design.

In my collection I have one of each type of German steel helmet to see
production. I also have the current U.S. helmet. They do not look alike. This
discussion is closed.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #5  
Old September 21st 04, 11:02 PM
Guinnog65
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"B2431" wrote in message
...

(snip)

OK, let's revisit another war for a moment. The vast majority of the
Soviet
populace hated Stalin. Many initially welcomed Hitler's invasion.
Almost
to a
person the Soviets banded together to expel and invader. This happens
in
almost
every invaded country situation. Look at the coalition that expelled
Sadam
from
Kuwait and how nations that didn't get along with each other did so
for
the
cause.

Wow! So you are comparing the US forces with the Wehrmacht?

Did I say that? I was comparing the Soviet reaction to the invasion.


So you would consider the Iraqis the invaders? In their own country? A
somewht unusual way of looking at things!


Since you insist on not reading what I wrote this discussion is closed.


(unanswered)

And you call
*me* anti-American! (I am not, btw, I am anti this illegal invasion)

The invasion was perfectly legal since sadam defied a dozen UN
resolutions,
abrogated his own agreements with the U.S. and had consistanly been
shooting at
U.S. and British aircraft that were enforcing the no fly zones sadam
agreed
to.


Not a point of view shared by Kofi Annan of the UN. Nor by the majority of
people I talk to.

There was a thing mentioned a lot at the time of the war about WMDs. Now
that this justification for the war has turned out to be false, do you
still
have no problem at all about the war's legality?


(unanswered)

They do have the same helmets I suppose...

The helmets don't even look anything alike.


I think they look very similar. And like alot of the Nazi kit, it was a
very
good design.

In my collection I have one of each type of German steel helmet to see
production. I also have the current U.S. helmet. They do not look alike.
This
discussion is closed.


Ok. As a certain contributor to this NG used to say, thanks for playing!

Enjoy your helmet collection.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
George W. Bush Abortion Scandal that should have been Psalm 110 Military Aviation 0 August 12th 04 09:40 AM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.