![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Orval Fairbairn writes: In article , ost (Chris Mark) wrote: From: Guy Alcala in 1941, they started to see just how much they could safely stretch the fuel economy of the Zero, individually and then in larger groups. Ten hour missions became routine, then 11 and eventually they were able to stay in the air for 12. Okumiya describes this in "Zero!", with average fuel consumption dropping to 21 gal./hr. and Saburo Sakai holding the record at only 18 gal./hr. Interesting. The Wright R-2600 engine burned about 75gph at 60 percent power. Any details on how the Japanese achieved such frugal fuel consumption figures? What was "normal" fuel consumption for the Zero? Chris Mark They achieved thos numbers by cutting back to 20%-30% power and aggressive leaning. Lindbergh taught the same concepts to USAAF P-38 pilots -- this technique is part of what enabled the Yamamoto shootdown. The P-38s were operating way outside their expected normal combat radius. Y'know, that's been mentioned any number of times about Lindberg's trip to the Pacific. But I have some doubts about it. The Carbs used on the later model P-38s were Bendix-Stromberg PD 12 pressure carbs. IIRC, These didn't have manual adjustment - you had settings of "Full Rich", Auto-Rich", "Auto-Lean", and "Idle Cutoff". you couldn't manually lean the engines. The secret to a low fuel burn is low RPM/High BMEP. To get this, you need to crank the prop to the desired cruise RPM (Usually Full Decrease or thereabouts, set the throttle to the maximum setting that maintains that RPM, and pull the mixture back to Auto-Lean. If you've chosen the proper cruise altitude, you'll be chugging along at the minumum drag IAS (Speed for best climb), and what determines your endurance will be whether the relief tube's plugged. I suspect that that's wht Lindy really taught them. It's not a great condition to be in if you're bounced, however - you can't just shove teh throttle forward & go. A Big recip can be remarkably delicate at times, and just shoving the throttle forward at low revs with a lean mixture is asking it to come apart. To spool things up, you've got to do the hand-jive, shoving teh mixture to Full Rich first, the prop to Full Increase, and then you can bring up the power with the throttle. I can see somebody who's concerned about being bounced keeping the mixture up in the AUto-Rich range and just fiddling with the revs (Prop) and Manifold Pressure (Throttle). -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Stickney wrote:
In article , Orval Fairbairn writes: In article , ost (Chris Mark) wrote: From: Guy Alcala in 1941, they started to see just how much they could safely stretch the fuel economy of the Zero, individually and then in larger groups. Ten hour missions became routine, then 11 and eventually they were able to stay in the air for 12. Okumiya describes this in "Zero!", with average fuel consumption dropping to 21 gal./hr. and Saburo Sakai holding the record at only 18 gal./hr. Interesting. The Wright R-2600 engine burned about 75gph at 60 percent power. Any details on how the Japanese achieved such frugal fuel consumption figures? What was "normal" fuel consumption for the Zero? Chris Mark They achieved thos numbers by cutting back to 20%-30% power and aggressive leaning. Lindbergh taught the same concepts to USAAF P-38 pilots -- this technique is part of what enabled the Yamamoto shootdown. The P-38s were operating way outside their expected normal combat radius. Y'know, that's been mentioned any number of times about Lindberg's trip to the Pacific. But I have some doubts about it. The Carbs used on the later model P-38s were Bendix-Stromberg PD 12 pressure carbs. IIRC, These didn't have manual adjustment - you had settings of "Full Rich", Auto-Rich", "Auto-Lean", and "Idle Cutoff". you couldn't manually lean the engines. The secret to a low fuel burn is low RPM/High BMEP. To get this, you need to crank the prop to the desired cruise RPM (Usually Full Decrease or thereabouts, set the throttle to the maximum setting that maintains that RPM, and pull the mixture back to Auto-Lean. If you've chosen the proper cruise altitude, you'll be chugging along at the minumum drag IAS (Speed for best climb), and what determines your endurance will be whether the relief tube's plugged. I suspect that that's wht Lindy really taught them. Exactly right. They'd been cruising in auto-rich, low MP/high rpm. He told them to put it in auto-lean, pull the prop back to 1,800 rpm and then advance the throttle until they got 180mph IAS (they'd been cruising at higher speeds). It's not a great condition to be in if you're bounced, however - you can't just shove teh throttle forward & go. A Big recip can be remarkably delicate at times, and just shoving the throttle forward at low revs with a lean mixture is asking it to come apart. To spool things up, you've got to do the hand-jive, shoving teh mixture to Full Rich first, the prop to Full Increase, and then you can bring up the power with the throttle. I can see somebody who's concerned about being bounced keeping the mixture up in the AUto-Rich range and just fiddling with the revs (Prop) and Manifold Pressure (Throttle). The advantage of the late-war Pacific was that most of the time you were flying over uninhabited areas or the sea, so really didn't need to worry about getting bounced except in the vicinity of airfields. The Japanese lack of fuel also played a part. The details are in Lindbergh's wartime journal, but IIRR the increased radii guarantees he made to Kenney, or maybe it was Whitehead, included going to auto rich and (IIRC) combat cruise speed in the combat zone, which I think he defined as 100 miles both in and out, plus combat allowance, etc. The crews didn't necessarily believe him the first couple of missions, but when they noticed he was returning to base with 100-200 gallons more fuel than they while flying the same missions, they paid attention. Guy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Cub Driver writes: On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:51:08 -0400, (Peter Stickney) wrote: If you've chosen the proper cruise altitude, you'll be chugging along at the minumum drag IAS (Speed for best climb), and what determines your endurance will be whether the relief tube's plugged. I suspect that that's wht Lindy really taught them. I don't know if this is relevant, but when Glen Edwards flew from Goose Bay in Canada to Bluie West One in Greenland, he remarked how uncomfortable it was, flying at the edge of a stall with his nose high and his tail low. Quite relevant, I'd say. Ernie Gann wrote about it in "Fate is the Hunter", as well. Apparently it went against every gut feeling they had. Even today, you'll find people who'll tell you that running an engine "oversquare" (More Manifold pressure in Inches Hg than RPM in 100s - say, 30" vs 3000R) is Absolutely Evil. (Again, you'll only get there with a controllable pitch prop - with a fixed pitch, set for takeoff power at sea level, you'll generally run out of torque defore you;ll reach the RPM redline at any sort of altitude). While its true that yo can overboost an engine if you aren't careful, thw Handbook numbers are solid - the Manufacturer can't get them past the FAA without proving them. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Remember Pearl Harbor: Special Program Tonight at EAA | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 0 | December 7th 04 07:40 PM |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |