![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Red wrote:
"WDA" wrote in message . net... SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP Meanwhile the USAF was putting the ALQ-76 "jamming pods on their F-4s. "Protection" by that pod required their a/c to fly in rigid parade formation to counter the Fansong radar. But if just one of the pod equipped planes slid out of formation it was immediately tracked and nailed by Guidline missiles. That was because the damned pods were actually beacons instead of jammers! WDA VF-24, VA-192, 1955 - 1959 Ah Hah! Flying the infamous SAM box with the ALQ-76. (The ALQ-76's were amplifying beacons). The theory was to keep a 800-1000 feet between aircraft. The signal return (+amplification) would look like one aircraft and the SAM would guide to the center of the blip. Therefore the SAM will detonate between the aircraft missing each by 400-500 feet. Would you trust this device? Allow me to point out that the Air Force fighters used the ALQ-71 (nee' QRC-160-1) and later the ALQ-87 (nee' QRC-160-8) noise jammers, not the ALQ-76. And the USN suffered greater percentage losses to SAMs in Vietnam than the USAF did, despite all the navy a/c being equipped with the ALQ-51. Both types of jammers had their advantages and disadvantages; the USAF began using the ALQ-101 (nee' QRC-335) combined noise/deception jammer from 1968, on those a/c that by nature of their missions (MiGCAP, Wild Weasel) had to fly more independently. With regard to Bill Allen's statement that the Air Force pods were "actually beacons instead of jammers," that's rather subject to fine print. Certainly by 1972 the VPAF/ADF SAM crews were sometimes operating in a "jamming strobe" mode, decreasing the gain to use the jamming strobe for direction/elevation, and a separate radar (often in another band) to provide range data. But AFAIK they never had the capability to use a true home-on-jam capability; the SA-2 was command guided (unlike the Sparrow), so how could they? The USAF noise jamming pods were also modified to jam the missile beacons (transponders) starting around the end of 1967, which proved extremely effective until the VPAF/ADF (actually, their Soviet advisers) made some changes to the transponders to make this type of jamming more difficult. This took effect no later than 1972, and possibly a bit earlier (I'd have to check a few sources). Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B-52 crew blamed for friendly fire death | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 0 | March 16th 04 12:49 AM |
Ham sandwich navigation and radar failure | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | December 31st 03 12:15 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
F15E Radar question. | Bill Silvey | Military Aviation | 5 | August 30th 03 06:17 PM |
Marine Radar in a plane? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 31 | August 13th 03 06:56 PM |