![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jaymes Littlehayles" wrote in message
.. . Alas, the bottom line answer to the original question is this... Same equipment operated by operators who knew and cared about doing the job correctly, are more likely then not to find anything... In late 70s, using early 70s technology, the Knox/Hewes class Frigate I was on using SPS10C and SPS40 series radar held contact on drone simulators as well as aircraft simulators that ships with "better" equipment couldn't find, much less track... The 10 and 40 are no match for a modern ASCM. Operators can exponentially improve a systems performance but those systems are just plain outdated. Considering the Knox had a gun, you could attack it with impunity from outside the range of the gun. A good operator might pick out a sea skimming missile but he'd better be good and the missile will be very close (ie. too late) As to shooting down... Same answer applies... Sure a Phalanx is "always on" ... But with appropriate notice... a properly trained and interested 5"/54 or 3"/50 crew can knock things out of sky that too many folks say is impossible... Just as the T-2 Buckeye driver of Viques Island who had the sock destroyed with 2 rounds from our lowly little frigate on the first high speed pass... How about a Tornado from Uruguayan Air Force who got plinked at high altitude/high speed as well as low altitude/low speed... Throw in an bit of countermeasures and plinking becomes very difficult, though I've seen some pretty skilled SPG-53 operators. Tornado's and Buckeyes have a pretty high RCS which helps considerably. An ASCM like an Exocet is much more difficult to pick out of the weeds. It isn't the equipment, it is the human designing and using it... Technology is no substitute for intelligence... Improvements in todays equipment coupled with very skilled technicians makes equipment today far more capable against the low angle threat. And also... That ship is now the heaviest armed warship on active duty in Africa, being the fagship of the Egyptian Navy as ENS Dumyat... BTW ex-EW1(ESWS/AC/DV) BTW ex EW2 ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B-52 crew blamed for friendly fire death | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 0 | March 16th 04 12:49 AM |
Ham sandwich navigation and radar failure | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | December 31st 03 12:15 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
F15E Radar question. | Bill Silvey | Military Aviation | 5 | August 30th 03 06:17 PM |
Marine Radar in a plane? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 31 | August 13th 03 06:56 PM |