![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ANDREW ROBERT BREEN" wrote in message ... In article , Charles Talleyrand wrote: Suppose someone tried to land an F4F Wildcat on a modern American aircraft carrier. We'll give the carrier a few hours to prepare, and lets assume the carrier is at sea and moving. Can a WWII fighter land on a modern carrier? Can it get back in the air? Given the much lower take off and landing speeds of WW2 aircraft, I'd not think there'd be a problem. At the extreme of low take off and landing speeds, ISTR the fleet Air Arm museum's Swordfish landing on and taking off from Illustrious a year or so ago as part of the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the Taranto raid - which of course would not present any problem to a Stringbag as Illustrious, while smaller than US carriers, is a lot bigger than many of the ships Swordfish operated from. Sure there could be problems. Maybe the arresting cables have grown in diameter and no longer can be reliably caught by the F4's hook. Maybe the catapult cannot be dialed down low enough for the light weight plane, or the connection between them has changed shape and size. Things become incompatable over time. If things were still compatable 60 years later that would be amazing. Things have changed so much since then. Note how the fuel is different, the O2 systems are different, the ammo is different, etc. Of course someone said similar planes have flown off modern carriers. The question becomes Did they use the arrresting gear? Did they use the catapult? -Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:35:32 -0400, "Charles Talleyrand"
wrote: the catapult cannot be dialed down low enough for the light weight plane, or the connection between them has changed shape and size. Many WWII carriers did not have catapults, and the planes operated just fine without them. What makes you think a catapult is necessary now? -- Andrew Toppan --- --- "I speak only for myself" "Haze Gray & Underway" - Naval History, DANFS, World Navies Today, Photo Features, Military FAQs, and more - http://www.hazegray.org/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many WWII carriers did not have catapults, and the planes operated just fine
without them. What makes you think a catapult is necessary now? In the Prowler flight simulator we used to do a deck run after a trap. We would just taxi back to the round down and spin around and cob the power. It was really not to difficult I would think that any moderen Jet aircraft F-14, F/a-18, EA-6B, S-3, E-2 could do a deck run the full length of the deck and get airborne at max landing weight. If you cranked up the wind you might make it at max T/O weight as well but I'm not sure about that. Sparky |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
What if Reagan was tried for war crimes ? | B2431 | Military Aviation | 8 | June 14th 04 09:48 PM |
missing man formation for Reagan | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 1 | June 14th 04 12:50 AM |
~ I WISH RONALD REAGAN WAS STILL ALIVE ~ | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 1 | June 9th 04 12:49 AM |
Wildcat crash in Houston | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 3 | October 27th 03 09:24 PM |