|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
October 20th 03, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:49:15 -0500, catsrus
wrote: Mary - Is there any sensible reason why your airframe was retired from service when it still seemed to be viable? No agency mission. We didn't have any experiments that justified keeping it going. Was it only a money issue or is there more to it than that? I suspect that money was part of the decision, since it usually is, but it was probably more of an effect than a cause. Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| max altitude and Mach 1 | Boomer | Military Aviation | 22 | June 1st 04 08:04 PM |
| Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
| Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |
| #1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
| Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |
Hybrid Mode
