![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/3/21 12:02 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2021 09:22:58 -0600, kinsell wrote: On 5/3/21 8:59 AM, jfitch wrote: "Aircraft has sustained some damage..." is a masterful understatement for a totaled aircraft. But I have to ask: what exactly is the point of a hydrogen powered airplane? 96% of commercial hydrogen is produced from fossil fuels, why not just use the fossil fuels? To fleece ignorant investors I'd assume, but still.... On Monday, May 3, 2021 at 6:58:29 AM UTC-7, kinsell wrote: https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...ogen-test-bed- crashes-after-off-airport-landing/?MailingID=604 If this was a "safe, off-airport landing", I'd sure hate to see a dangerous off-airport crash. Anytime you rip a wing off, I think that crosses the line between the two. It's not just ignorant investors getting fleeced, unwilling taxpayers are the targets of these scams thanks to ignorant governments. But some of these new projects are truly revolutionary. Take the ASKA. Please. Here you have a car that fits in your garage, electric motors in the wheels to run around town, and for longer trips, just push a button and it unfolds into marvelous flying machine. For the same price as a nice motorglider, you get six engines instead of one, with a 250 mile range, beating even a Jeta. And it does the vertical takeoff, eliminating that annoying trip to the airport. This baby's going to be flying next year. Since not even lithium batteries last forever, it's got a dirty old ICE engine, but with the ever popular hydrogen option to keep the greenie weenies happy. It's something George Jetson never could have dreamed of. Just hope it meets California emission standards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TGVSoejkW4 Design, build prototype, test fly, certify, scale up into production in 5 years with apparently no hardware to show off yet? Really? ... and there's always Alauda, https://airspeeder.com/ whose only visible progress is a crash in 2019 that attracted the AAIB's attention and generated a scathing report from them, AAIB-25876, last year. Meanwhile, Joby Aviation say they've been working on their flying electric taxi for 10 years and 1000 flights, yet are only planning certification for 2023 and starting operations in 2024. Of these, only the latter seem likely to have an eVTOL aircraft close to commercial operation by 2025. In any case, since these all have unshielded rotors, what are the chances that any of them will ever be certified for off-airfield operations? here's another VTOL air taxi thingie, using hydrogen fuel cells. 2019 article sez they were hoping for FAA certification in 2020. You betcha. Then the CEO says it'll be another 10 years before the service is practical. https://www.greenoptimistic.com/hydr...ange-20190603/ It's "fundamentally human" and "here today" (in 2019). So let's see one. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This F-22 Raptor Wing Tank Storage Facility Looks Like A Science Fiction Movie Set - F-22 Raptor Wing Tank Storage Facility 2.jpg ... | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 23rd 20 04:26 AM |
Saturn V S-IC-T (static test stage) fuel tank assembly is mated to the liquid oxygen (LOX) tank 6416666.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:33 AM |
oxygen tank | Lignan Christian | Soaring | 10 | February 9th 06 10:52 PM |
Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 02:57 AM |