![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... Hi Tom. Scary. I retired from the Navy in 1976 and went to work as an engineer at a large well known company on RT 128 outside of Boston. I specifically worked on the AN/AAD-5 system, and our customer was the Shah of Iran for use with the F-4s bought from us. I imagine they are now obsolete. Sounds interesting. Sorry for my ignorance: what exactly is the AAD-5? An IRST? Namely, I've always been told that the IIAF was never very much interested in IRST-systems, and that this was the reason they haven't purchased any for their F-14s either. What I've heard is that in 1978, in the Project Peace Enforcer, some of their F-4Ds were modified to get the IRST housing, but that this contained the ALR-17 basic countermeasure warning receiver, and the APG-26 SAM-launch detection system. I don't know who run this upgrade (i.e. USAF, USN, McD or somebody else), but four Iranian F-4Ds should've been modified that way before the revolution (in February 1979), and they've also got additonal kits to upgrade six other Phantoms, plus a three-year spare support packages for them. I know they used such Ds to lead their strike-packages deep into Iraq with immense success. Very scary, but if there is only 15, I suspect they would be called "turkey meat" if they challenged F-14s, 15s, 16s or 18s. Surely, in air-to-air they are dead meat, but I consider them still potent platforms in the anti-ship role - at least for local circumstances. Namely, one must bear in mind that the IRIAF is still flying also more than 50 F-4Es, which are modified with similar weapons like the F-4Ds, so there is a large number of platforms each of which can carry two C.802s. The testing of the C.802 in Iran was very rigorous, and proved that the weapon has a capability comparable to the AGM-84 Harpoon. Of course, in the case of any kind of serious action their eventual capability would heavily depend on the capability of the IRIAF to supply them with any kind of proper targeting info in the first place.... You seem well informed -- so, what *do* they have that would be a challenge to us.? Their most potent fighters remain F-14s - that are not only still very much operational but meanwhile also armed with some kind of a reverse-engineered AIM-54s (I guess we'll get some uproar from specific people on this NG regarding this, but I can't help), and the R-73/AA-11s too. Of course, one can argue a lot about the capabilities of current IRIAF pilots when compared to their potential USAF/USN opponents, or about the whole air combat system of the US military, but the fact is that the AIM-54 remains longer-ranged in comparission to the AIM-120, so - at least in theory - there is always an unknown factor there... Tom Cooper Co-Author: Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988: http://www.acig.org/pg1/content.php and, Iranian F-4 Phantom II Units in Combat: http://www.osprey-publishing.co.uk/t...hp/title=S6585 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Cooper:
Sounds interesting. Sorry for my ignorance: what exactly is the AAD-5? An IRST? It's an IR detector system, two bands. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|