![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Emmanuel Gustin" wrote in message ... "WaltBJ" wrote in message om... IS the Rafale dead? Nobody answered the question. Rafale is alive, but the French are more or less skipping the first 'series' of Rafales. Only a dozen production aircraft (two for the air force, ten for the Navy) were built to 'F1' standard, basically air-air capability only. Just enough to create a naval 'Flotille' for the 'Charles de Gaulle' and support further development. The main production is now planned to be of upgraded versions. Rafales to the 'F2' standard, with air-ground capability, will enter service in 2004, with initial operation capability in 2006. This is a pretty horrible procurment strategy. It's basically ... Research a new design Build 13 of them Let the design age for ten years Update the radar software (and possibly uprate the engines) Go into series production Boy, I hope someone in France is regretting not signing onto the Eurofighter deal. Almost anything would be better than the current Rafale situation. The final 198 Rafales for the air force and 35 for the Navy are to be to the final multi-role 'F3' standard, delivered from 2008 onwards. Then, all older Rafales will be upgraded to 'F3' standard. So the entry in production of Rafale is shifted into the future; the Mirage 2000 will serve longer. Some of the delay can be caused by requested modifications (significantly, after the 1991 Gulf War, the French decided that the majority of the Rafales will have a seat for a WSO) but the main motive is probably purely financial, the French budgettary situation isn't very healthy at the moment. But I suspect that this is a pattern we will see more and more in combat aircraft development. The time when an air force could afford to buy models with limited capability and put them in stock or upgrade them afterwards, is past. BTW the US armed forces, with the exception of the Navy, didn't have anything to fight with in 1941, let alone 1939. Look it up. True. On the other hand the US Congress actually refused to sell weapons to Britain and France at a very critical moment. -- Emmanuel Gustin Emmanuel.Gustin -rem@ve- skynet dot be Flying Guns Page: http://users.skynet.be/Emmanuel.Gustin/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should Memorial Day and America's War Dead be commercialized? | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | May 24th 04 02:29 AM |
DEAD AMERICAN SOLDIERS NOT WELCOMED HOME! | Denyav | Military Aviation | 1 | April 24th 04 07:14 PM |
Is Rafale dead? | Charles Talleyrand | Military Aviation | 87 | January 12th 04 11:43 PM |
Air Force wife, kids found dead | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 19th 03 04:36 AM |
Dead F-111 Pilot was only a passenger | Vector | Military Aviation | 3 | July 8th 03 01:11 AM |