A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why Zuni?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 04, 03:51 PM
Jim Carriere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Pechs1" wrote in message
I've blasted all 11(?) or so in one pod, of 2.75, on one wing, all at

once.
Really impressive, makes the A/C yaw...and they go all over the place,
particularly if ya have one where all the fins don't come out.


! ! !


  #2  
Old January 20th 04, 04:07 AM
mkarsten
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Canadian CRV-7 was termed the "Mighty Mouse", and was typically packed
into either LAU-5002's or LAU- 5003's (In the case of RNZAF A4's).

Regards

Mike
"Jim Carriere" wrote in message
...
"Pechs1" wrote in message
I've blasted all 11(?) or so in one pod, of 2.75, on one wing, all at

once.
Really impressive, makes the A/C yaw...and they go all over the place,
particularly if ya have one where all the fins don't come out.


! ! !




  #3  
Old January 20th 04, 04:28 AM
WaltBJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ed, '40 feet' was qualifying. But the pod rockets were sorry compared
to tube-launched ones out of the F86D and the F102. Rockets fired from
the Dog and Deuce could hit about as good as strafing. Our target on
Zulu-shima off Okinawa was 3 oil drums filled with sand stacked
together. The Dog could hit the fool things. Also, firing on the rag,
you could see the rockets cut a cross in it. We only fired 6 at a
time, though. Fired the Deuce on Patricia Target about 40 miles west
of Key West. It was an old WW2 destroyer beached by the Marquesas
Keys. WE went down to Homestead for the Cuban Crisis. Once down there
someone realized we needed the rocket tubes wired up - they'd clipped
the leads when we got the GAR11/AIM26A (Fat Falcon). Once that was
done, some kind soul decided they needed to be tested. So we fired
each of our 20 Deuces twice on Pat Target - what? No practice rockets
available? Okay, use ones with live warheads. Now, a 2.75 FFAR is
equivalent to a 75mm HE round - when we got through, what had looked
like the bridge of a ship was now a pile of scrap from. 20x12x2=480
rockets. (12 a sortie because the innermost 6 tubes -2 RX per tube-
were lost because of the girth of the Gar11.) Last time I saw Pattie
Target was in 1980 - it was a rusted layer of iron we had to chase
fishermen off of to bomb it with the deadly BDU33s and Mk106s. Mel
Fisher's boat marked the entry to the nuke run-in while salving the
Atocha galleon.
Walt BJ
  #4  
Old January 24th 04, 04:23 PM
Susan VanCamp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its been many moons since I fired a rocket (most inventories got combat
coded due to limited #s years ago), but...

....it was a Zuni pod at night, on the goggles -- ya-bleeping-hoo! When
fired in singles or small numbers, 2.75s always sounded like bottle rockets
(from the cockpit). Zunis were an entirely different animal.

A technical question for those that might know -- refresh my aging memory --
isn't the Zuni motor the same as that used on the Sidewinder...?

"Jim Carriere" wrote in message
...
"Pechs1" wrote in message
I've blasted all 11(?) or so in one pod, of 2.75, on one wing, all at

once.
Really impressive, makes the A/C yaw...and they go all over the place,
particularly if ya have one where all the fins don't come out.


! ! !




  #5  
Old January 26th 04, 08:43 PM
Jeb Hoge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Susan VanCamp" wrote in message link.net...
Its been many moons since I fired a rocket (most inventories got combat
coded due to limited #s years ago), but...

...it was a Zuni pod at night, on the goggles -- ya-bleeping-hoo! When
fired in singles or small numbers, 2.75s always sounded like bottle rockets
(from the cockpit). Zunis were an entirely different animal.

A technical question for those that might know -- refresh my aging memory --
isn't the Zuni motor the same as that used on the Sidewinder...?


Originally, I'm pretty sure Sidewinder was designed using Zuni bodies and motors.
  #6  
Old January 27th 04, 08:35 PM
John Carrier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeb Hoge" wrote in message
om...
"Susan VanCamp" wrote in message

link.net...
Its been many moons since I fired a rocket (most inventories got combat
coded due to limited #s years ago), but...

...it was a Zuni pod at night, on the goggles -- ya-bleeping-hoo! When
fired in singles or small numbers, 2.75s always sounded like bottle

rockets
(from the cockpit). Zunis were an entirely different animal.

A technical question for those that might know -- refresh my aging

memory --
isn't the Zuni motor the same as that used on the Sidewinder...?


Originally, I'm pretty sure Sidewinder was designed using Zuni bodies and

motors.

Nope. The Zuni burn time was very short, perhaps 1 second. SW was at least
5. I've fired both from fuselage pylons on the F-8. The Zuni approximated
a freight train speeding past your head with about 6 inches clearance.

R / John


  #7  
Old January 27th 04, 09:48 PM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Carrier" wrote...

Originally, I'm pretty sure Sidewinder was designed using Zuni bodies and

motors.

Nope. The Zuni burn time was very short, perhaps 1 second. SW was at least
5.


However, IIRC, the Zuni motor was used on the Skipper, a rocket-boosted Paveway
2 LGB...

  #8  
Old January 28th 04, 03:42 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"John Carrier" writes:

"Jeb Hoge" wrote in message
om...
"Susan VanCamp" wrote in message

link.net...
Its been many moons since I fired a rocket (most inventories got combat
coded due to limited #s years ago), but...

...it was a Zuni pod at night, on the goggles -- ya-bleeping-hoo! When
fired in singles or small numbers, 2.75s always sounded like bottle

rockets
(from the cockpit). Zunis were an entirely different animal.

A technical question for those that might know -- refresh my aging

memory --
isn't the Zuni motor the same as that used on the Sidewinder...?


Originally, I'm pretty sure Sidewinder was designed using Zuni bodies and

motors.

Nope. The Zuni burn time was very short, perhaps 1 second. SW was at least
5. I've fired both from fuselage pylons on the F-8. The Zuni approximated
a freight train speeding past your head with about 6 inches clearance.


IIRC, the Mk 17 motor on an early Sidewinder burned for about 2-2 1/4
seconds. The Mk 36 in the AIM-9C and its derivatives burned for
something between 4 & 5 seconds. The Mk 36 has more impule (Total
energy), but lower thrust.


--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
  #9  
Old January 28th 04, 10:26 AM
Guy Alcala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Stickney wrote:

In article ,
"John Carrier" writes:

"Jeb Hoge" wrote in message
om...
"Susan VanCamp" wrote in message

link.net...
Its been many moons since I fired a rocket (most inventories got combat
coded due to limited #s years ago), but...

...it was a Zuni pod at night, on the goggles -- ya-bleeping-hoo! When
fired in singles or small numbers, 2.75s always sounded like bottle

rockets
(from the cockpit). Zunis were an entirely different animal.

A technical question for those that might know -- refresh my aging

memory --
isn't the Zuni motor the same as that used on the Sidewinder...?

Originally, I'm pretty sure Sidewinder was designed using Zuni bodies and

motors.

Nope. The Zuni burn time was very short, perhaps 1 second. SW was at least
5. I've fired both from fuselage pylons on the F-8. The Zuni approximated
a freight train speeding past your head with about 6 inches clearance.


IIRC, the Mk 17 motor on an early Sidewinder burned for about 2-2 1/4
seconds.


2.2 sec. burn time, 4,200 lb. max. thrust, 8,800 lb. sec. total impulse, per
Combat Snap.

The Mk 36 in the AIM-9C and its derivatives burned for
something between 4 & 5 seconds. The Mk 36 has more impule (Total
energy), but lower thrust.


I know I've got it, but can't find the data -- Aargh!

Guy




  #10  
Old January 28th 04, 12:31 PM
Thomas Schoene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Carrier wrote:
"Jeb Hoge" wrote in message
om...


Originally, I'm pretty sure Sidewinder was designed using Zuni
bodies and motors.


Nope. The Zuni burn time was very short, perhaps 1 second. SW was
at least
5. I've fired both from fuselage pylons on the F-8. The Zuni
approximated a freight train speeding past your head with about 6
inches clearance.


FWIW, _Sidewinder_ (by Ron Westrum) says Sidewinder used the motor of the
"High-Performance Air-to-Ground" rocket that China Lake was developing. It
was picked specifically because it was a slow-burn, low-acceleration rocket
that woudn't damage Sidewinder's fairly fragile seeker.

The China Lake alumni organization's website has one picture of a Skyraider
with HPAGs under the wings. They are non-podded rockets with fixed tail
fins, quite different from Zuni.

http://www.chinalakealumni.org/1954.htm

(You'll have to scroll the photo list a bit; I can't find a way to link
directly to the right picture and still show the caption.)

--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing
special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed)




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.