![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Lansford wrote in message . ..
Jim Herring wrote: They're results were that a frozen chicken did no more damage than a room temperature chicken. They assumed a lot about impact damage with faulty data and testing. They should let me hit them with a frozen chicken and a thawed one and tell me which one hurt more. If you hit them at about 100 m/s I doubt they will be around to tell you which one hurt more. Dive into your swimming pool from the edge and then try hitting it at 400 mph and see if you feel a difference. Tis the velocity not the softness of the substance that hurts! As someone else pointed out, the frozen one is going to act like a solid mass, while the thawed one is going to "explode" and deform when hitting the windshield. At the speed of a modern fighter I doubt either case is going to leave one unscarred. I read somewhere that even if the plexiglass holds out the "wave" travelling through the canopy caused by the strike could seriously injure/incapacitate a pilot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
chicken thief | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 3 | April 3rd 04 03:20 AM |
Britain Reveals Secret Weapon - Chicken Powered Nuclear Bomb ! | Ian | Military Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 03:18 PM |
WWII 20mm cannon in planes | zxcv | Military Aviation | 13 | March 10th 04 10:52 AM |
Future military fighters and guns - yes or no ? | championsleeper | Military Aviation | 77 | March 3rd 04 04:11 AM |
Development of British cannon ammuniation during WW2 | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 14 | December 29th 03 09:25 AM |