A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Was The Grumman "Bearcat" Flown Off Carriers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 22nd 04, 07:49 PM
Nice Again
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Navy system wasn't bizzarre. It made it easy to identiy a/c (mental
picture) by just the lettr and numbers.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

"Nice Again" wrote in message
...

F fighter
8 eighth model
F Grumman


I did not ask for an explanation of the Navy's bizarre designation system,
it was your message that was a mystery.




  #2  
Old January 23rd 04, 02:49 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nice Again" wrote in message
...

The Navy system wasn't bizzarre.


The Navy system had multiple designations for virtually identical aircraft.
That's bizarre.



It made it easy to identiy a/c (mental
picture) by just the lettr and numbers.


No easier than the USAAF/USAF system, which had the advantages of order and
logic.


  #3  
Old January 23rd 04, 03:06 AM
Ogden Johnson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Nice Again" wrote


The Navy system wasn't bizzarre.


The Navy system had multiple designations for virtually identical aircraft.
That's bizarre.


It made it easy to identiy a/c (mental
picture) by just the lettr and numbers.


No easier than the USAAF/USAF system, which had the advantages of order and
logic.


But.

The USAAF/USAF system didn't permit any fun aircraft, like B1RDs.
--
OJ III
[Email sent to Yahoo addy is burned before reading.
Lower and crunch the sig and you'll net me at comcast]
  #4  
Old January 23rd 04, 03:21 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ogden Johnson III" wrote in message
...

The USAAF/USAF system didn't permit any fun aircraft, like B1RDs.


The Navy system didn't allow a B1RD.


  #5  
Old January 23rd 04, 03:45 AM
Jack G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How about a GU11?

Jack
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Ogden Johnson III" wrote in message
...

The USAAF/USAF system didn't permit any fun aircraft, like B1RDs.


The Navy system didn't allow a B1RD.




  #6  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:10 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jack G" wrote in message
...

How about a GU11?


Nope. What type aircraft would the letters GU designate? Where's the
manufacturer's letter?


  #7  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:36 AM
Thomas Schoene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Jack G" wrote in message
...

How about a GU11?


Nope. What type aircraft would the letters GU designate?


It's a special type used to deliver letters to the mail buoy. Its presence
has been known to attract seabats, which the crews capture and take aboard
ships as pets.





Or in the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn, "That's a joke, son."

--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing
special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed)




  #8  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:27 PM
Nice Again
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Those are L's.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

"Jack G" wrote in message
...

How about a GU11?


Nope. What type aircraft would the letters GU designate? Where's the
manufacturer's letter?




  #9  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:06 AM
Ogden Johnson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Ogden Johnson III" wrote


The USAAF/USAF system didn't permit any fun aircraft, like B1RDs.


The Navy system didn't allow a B1RD.


Unlike the Air Farce, the USN/USMC are military services, and
have a sense of humor; so they never let inconsequential
technicalities stand in the way of a joke.
--
OJ III
[Email sent to Yahoo addy is burned before reading.
Lower and crunch the sig and you'll net me at comcast]
  #10  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:12 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ogden Johnson III" wrote in message
...

Unlike the Air Farce, the USN/USMC are military services, and
have a sense of humor; so they never let inconsequential
technicalities stand in the way of a joke.


I guess the USAF types must just have a more sophisticated sense of humor.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grumman FAAV? Charles Gray Military Aviation 1 July 19th 04 06:55 AM
Most aircraft types flown by 1 pilot? Chad Irby Military Aviation 10 January 7th 04 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.