A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 23rd 04, 07:20 PM
Boomer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I hear ya, but they expect the new explosive wad will make up the
differance, combined with penetration, speed and accuracy. The problem is
that the weapon is being driven by bay size rather than performance so who
knows if they are really just blowing smoke to have SOMETHING that works in
the small bays, of if it really is/will be better.

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

"Boomer" wrote in message
...
The SDB will have an autopilot which will allow it to reach the target

with
more kinetic energy than a standard JDAM flight profile. Combine that

with
a
new explosive package and they SAY it will have the same effectiveness

as
a
2000lb bomb. The ER (or is it EX) version will have a potential range of

60
miles.



I rather doubt that the KE fraction will be high enough to
offset more than 1000lbs of HE

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000

Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption

=---


  #2  
Old February 23rd 04, 07:30 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Boomer" wrote in message
...
I hear ya, but they expect the new explosive wad will make up the
differance, combined with penetration, speed and accuracy. The problem is
that the weapon is being driven by bay size rather than performance so who
knows if they are really just blowing smoke to have SOMETHING that works

in
the small bays, of if it really is/will be better.


Spoon feeding Lockheed a fighter program has been a major driving force for
the USAF for many years.


  #3  
Old February 24th 04, 09:32 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Boomer" wrote in message
...
I hear ya, but they expect the new explosive wad will make up the
differance, combined with penetration, speed and accuracy. The problem is
that the weapon is being driven by bay size rather than performance so who
knows if they are really just blowing smoke to have SOMETHING that works

in
the small bays, of if it really is/will be better.


Dont get me wrong here. For plinking tanks, vehicles and dugouts the
smaller bomb size is a good idea. As well as permitting an aircraft to
carry more weapons they limit collateral damage. My point was simply
that there are some targets for which you'll stay want the option of the
larger bomb.

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replace fabric with glass Ernest Christley Home Built 38 April 17th 04 11:37 AM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Military Aviation 265 March 7th 04 09:28 AM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Naval Aviation 2 February 22nd 04 06:22 AM
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... Aerophotos Military Aviation 10 November 3rd 03 11:49 PM
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 October 22nd 03 09:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.