![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hear ya, but they expect the new explosive wad will make up the
differance, combined with penetration, speed and accuracy. The problem is that the weapon is being driven by bay size rather than performance so who knows if they are really just blowing smoke to have SOMETHING that works in the small bays, of if it really is/will be better. "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Boomer" wrote in message ... The SDB will have an autopilot which will allow it to reach the target with more kinetic energy than a standard JDAM flight profile. Combine that with a new explosive package and they SAY it will have the same effectiveness as a 2000lb bomb. The ER (or is it EX) version will have a potential range of 60 miles. I rather doubt that the KE fraction will be high enough to offset more than 1000lbs of HE Keith ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boomer" wrote in message ... I hear ya, but they expect the new explosive wad will make up the differance, combined with penetration, speed and accuracy. The problem is that the weapon is being driven by bay size rather than performance so who knows if they are really just blowing smoke to have SOMETHING that works in the small bays, of if it really is/will be better. Spoon feeding Lockheed a fighter program has been a major driving force for the USAF for many years. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boomer" wrote in message ... I hear ya, but they expect the new explosive wad will make up the differance, combined with penetration, speed and accuracy. The problem is that the weapon is being driven by bay size rather than performance so who knows if they are really just blowing smoke to have SOMETHING that works in the small bays, of if it really is/will be better. Dont get me wrong here. For plinking tanks, vehicles and dugouts the smaller bomb size is a good idea. As well as permitting an aircraft to carry more weapons they limit collateral damage. My point was simply that there are some targets for which you'll stay want the option of the larger bomb. Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Replace fabric with glass | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 38 | April 17th 04 11:37 AM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Naval Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 06:22 AM |
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 10 | November 3rd 03 11:49 PM |
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | October 22nd 03 09:41 AM |