![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not being the professional my self, but an avid desktop pilot, my
understanding is that trap values are a meassure of the maximum bringback fuelweight that would allow the AC to trap the wire on the carrier. 4.0 would mean 4000 lbs JP4, which might be considered a bit on the skimpy side, espc. in bad weather, at night or with a wounded bird, what with no easy divert field close by. I'm not certain of the numbers (and others will hopefully correct me) but I think that 4.0 is near minimums to two attempts at the deck if there is other traffic in the pattern, when flying the F4 and cheers for the info, I'm brushing up on my Vietnam knowledge in anticipation of recieving my next boardgame: "Downtown", which looks at strike warfare in routepack 5 and 6 (AFAIR) cheers, Morten "Rob van Riel" wrote in message om... (Pechs1) wrote in message ... robvr- Navy Phantoms were capable of carrying a 20mm gunpod, but there is an abundance of references stating this weapon was worse than useless for air to air use, and thus not carried. BRBR The biggest obstacle was the weight of the thing and how ya had to 'bring it back'. Makes sense. If ya had 2 and 2 and the pod, max trap was in the 4.0 range. Plus wing tanks got the crap beat outta them on the boat. Almost makes sense, mainly because I never flew anything myself, let alone a Navy jet. Would 2 and 2 mean 2 Sparrow, 2 Sidewinder? What do max trap values mean? I know enough to know this has something to do with landing parameters, but I couldn't tell you what to save my life. Rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morten,
4000 lbs JP4 Microscopic nit: Carrier-borne aircraft used JP5 in my day. Higher flashpoint, thus safer around the boat. Not sure, but ISTR the boat uses another JP type these days?! Ashore, they burn JP4, allowing XC stops at the nice golf courses positioned at nearly all AFBs. g -- Mike Kanze "When you're majoring in abnormal psychology, ALL television is educational!" - Frank & Ernest, 3/9/04 "morten lund" wrote in message . .. Not being the professional my self, but an avid desktop pilot, my understanding is that trap values are a meassure of the maximum bringback fuelweight that would allow the AC to trap the wire on the carrier. 4.0 would mean 4000 lbs JP4, which might be considered a bit on the skimpy side, espc. in bad weather, at night or with a wounded bird, what with no easy divert field close by. I'm not certain of the numbers (and others will hopefully correct me) but I think that 4.0 is near minimums to two attempts at the deck if there is other traffic in the pattern, when flying the F4 and cheers for the info, I'm brushing up on my Vietnam knowledge in anticipation of recieving my next boardgame: "Downtown", which looks at strike warfare in routepack 5 and 6 (AFAIR) cheers, Morten "Rob van Riel" wrote in message om... (Pechs1) wrote in message ... robvr- Navy Phantoms were capable of carrying a 20mm gunpod, but there is an abundance of references stating this weapon was worse than useless for air to air use, and thus not carried. BRBR The biggest obstacle was the weight of the thing and how ya had to 'bring it back'. Makes sense. If ya had 2 and 2 and the pod, max trap was in the 4.0 range. Plus wing tanks got the crap beat outta them on the boat. Almost makes sense, mainly because I never flew anything myself, let alone a Navy jet. Would 2 and 2 mean 2 Sparrow, 2 Sidewinder? What do max trap values mean? I know enough to know this has something to do with landing parameters, but I couldn't tell you what to save my life. Rob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Kanze" wrote:
Morten, 4000 lbs JP4 Microscopic nit: Carrier-borne aircraft used JP5 in my day. Higher flashpoint, thus safer around the boat. Not sure, but ISTR the boat uses another JP type these days?! Ashore, they burn JP4, allowing XC stops at the nice golf courses positioned at nearly all AFBs. g USAF started the transition to JP8 in 1979. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I stand corrected; was I reasonably close with regard to the other stuff I
wrung out? :-) cheers, Morten "Mike Kanze" wrote in message ... Morten, 4000 lbs JP4 Microscopic nit: Carrier-borne aircraft used JP5 in my day. Higher flashpoint, thus safer around the boat. Not sure, but ISTR the boat uses another JP type these days?! Ashore, they burn JP4, allowing XC stops at the nice golf courses positioned at nearly all AFBs. g rest of thread snipped :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We used 4.0 day time, 5.1 night time or non-case 1 daytime. We used to pull the
cb on tank 7 so it wouldn't transfer...held it until recovery so you could be 5.1 twice on the ball if ya went into the penalty box. The CG thing w/o sparrows aft wasn't a big deal. P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pechs1" wrote in message ... We used 4.0 day time, 5.1 night time or non-case 1 daytime. We used to pull the cb on tank 7 so it wouldn't transfer...held it until recovery so you could be 5.1 twice on the ball if ya went into the penalty box. The CG thing w/o sparrows aft wasn't a big deal. Just enough change in CG to assist in pitch rate a bit. Once I got reasonably proficient in the jet I could tell the difference between a late and early block jet ... the early (non-transferring) being the preferred ride. R / John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What happened to the US AF RF-4 Phantoms ? | Prowlus | Military Aviation | 4 | August 28th 04 04:30 PM |
ECM pods on navy phantoms | Rob van Riel | Military Aviation | 4 | October 23rd 03 03:34 AM |
Question about GAF Phantoms landing | SA | Military Aviation | 5 | October 7th 03 05:17 AM |