A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

gunpods on Phantoms



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 17th 04, 02:56 PM
Pechs1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John- But the most fuel weight (regardless of configuration) was 5.1 for an
empty
tank 7, 5.8 with it full. No fun was night recovery with 2x2 ordnance and
1/2 flaps (util failure or in my case, a flap switch failure). 1.8 on the
ball for an actual weight pass with about 40 knots of wind. BRBR

Yowser-with or w/o ail droop?
Blue water, I assume? If ya went around, into the barricade? Could they get
enough WOD for that(115kt max engaging speed(?)).

I saw a 1/2 flap, really damaged F-4 go thru the net like it wasn't there.
Exceeded the max engaging speed by a lot..BUT it slowed it down enough so the
jet wasn't flying. Both guys shelled out, neither made it. VF-102, USS
Independence, 1977 or so.
P. C. Chisholm
CDR, USN(ret.)
Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer
  #2  
Old March 18th 04, 12:56 AM
John Carrier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yowser-with or w/o ail droop?
Blue water, I assume? If ya went around, into the barricade? Could they

get
enough WOD for that(115kt max engaging speed(?)).


Next to last East Coast F-4 cruise with 102/Independence ... 153xxx F-4J
with drooped ailerons. Somewhere in the Arabian sea, night. Dirtied up and
noticed the airspeed was around 165 or so vice the 143-5 that a normal
airplane would see at full flaps. Gauge indicated full, cycled them through
1/2 ... no change in speed or aircraft response. Cycled them up and back to
full ... still 165. Sooo. We told CATCC that we wanted a low pass and
speed check with SPN-42.'

They confirmed our speed. Cleaned up tanked a bit ... twice I think as the
galley slaves responded to the increased tempo drumbeat. About a 1/2 hour
later they were ready. Wanted us around 2.0 or thereabouts and ran the
weights. Flies a nice pass at 1/2 flaps, honored the stronger burble ...
but not much ... and grabbed the 1 on the fly.

A bingo wasn't totally out of the question, but Misira (sp?) wasn't a
desirable action (diplomatic issues back then) and D-Gar was a long LONG way
away.

R / John


  #3  
Old March 18th 04, 02:36 PM
John S. Shinal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Carrier" wrote:

... and grabbed the 1 on the fly.

Is that a...ahem...unusually abrupt trap ?



----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #4  
Old March 18th 04, 06:47 PM
John Carrier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John S. Shinal" wrote in message
...
"John Carrier" wrote:

... and grabbed the 1 on the fly.

Is that a...ahem...unusually abrupt trap ?


Implying that I just barely grabbed it (as opposed to being settled on the
main mounts prior to picking up the wire). Most (all?) aircraft touch down
tailhook first.

R / John


  #5  
Old March 19th 04, 06:26 PM
Paul Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

... and grabbed the 1 on the fly.

Is that a...ahem...unusually abrupt trap ?


Implying that I just barely grabbed it (as opposed to being settled on the
main mounts prior to picking up the wire). Most (all?) aircraft touch down
tailhook first.


All I know is what I read in books, but I seem to recall that the opposite
of catching a one wire "on the fly" is a "taxi one wire," which suggests a
low and/or flat approach. But I'll defer to those who have BTDT.
  #6  
Old March 26th 04, 03:55 PM
John S. Shinal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Carrier" wrote:
Implying that I just barely grabbed it (as opposed to being settled on the
main mounts prior to picking up the wire). Most (all?) aircraft touch down
tailhook first.


Oh hell - sorry. I wasn't casting aspersions on your skill at
the ramp, I thought you were alluding to something I heard of as an
"airborne engagement". It's supposed to be a murderous thump. I don't
know quite enough about the geometry over the wire to make any other
conclusions.

I just didn't know what "caught it on the fly" meant.



----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #7  
Old March 26th 04, 09:38 PM
John Carrier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No offense taken.

John

"John S. Shinal" wrote in message
...
"John Carrier" wrote:
Implying that I just barely grabbed it (as opposed to being settled on

the
main mounts prior to picking up the wire). Most (all?) aircraft touch

down
tailhook first.


Oh hell - sorry. I wasn't casting aspersions on your skill at
the ramp, I thought you were alluding to something I heard of as an
"airborne engagement". It's supposed to be a murderous thump. I don't
know quite enough about the geometry over the wire to make any other
conclusions.

I just didn't know what "caught it on the fly" meant.



----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000

Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption

=---


  #8  
Old March 27th 04, 02:31 AM
sid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Carrier" wrote in message ...
Implying that I just barely grabbed it (as opposed to being settled on the

main mounts prior to picking up the wire). Most (all?) aircraft touch down
tailhook first.

R / John


Kinda like this?
http://www.news.navy.mil/management/...-4142G-106.jpg
  #9  
Old March 27th 04, 12:26 PM
John Carrier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Groan! That much wing down with a Phantom would probably blow the left
strut.

R / John

"sid" wrote in message
om...
"John Carrier" wrote in message

...
Implying that I just barely grabbed it (as opposed to being settled on

the
main mounts prior to picking up the wire). Most (all?) aircraft touch

down
tailhook first.

R / John


Kinda like this?
http://www.news.navy.mil/management/...-4142G-106.jpg



  #10  
Old March 27th 04, 12:37 PM
Doug \Woody\ and Erin Beal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Foul line doesn't look like much protection there! There's video out there
somewhere of a Hornet pulling the same thing... A "RIGHT FOR LINEUP." call
from the LSO at the ramp.

Pilot does a very aggressive right wing down correction and catches his
wingtip LAU on the one wire.

There's some wild funky chicken and swearing on the mouse audio before he
comes to a stop. Thankfully, no one was hurt.

--Woody

On 3/27/04 6:26 AM, in article , "John
Carrier" wrote:

Groan! That much wing down with a Phantom would probably blow the left
strut.

R / John

"sid" wrote in message
om...
"John Carrier" wrote in message

...
Implying that I just barely grabbed it (as opposed to being settled on

the
main mounts prior to picking up the wire). Most (all?) aircraft touch

down
tailhook first.

R / John


Kinda like this?
http://www.news.navy.mil/management/...-4142G-106.jpg



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What happened to the US AF RF-4 Phantoms ? Prowlus Military Aviation 4 August 28th 04 04:30 PM
ECM pods on navy phantoms Rob van Riel Military Aviation 4 October 23rd 03 03:34 AM
Question about GAF Phantoms landing SA Military Aviation 5 October 7th 03 05:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.