![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
snipped for brevity The only early warning system Hawaii had (besides the overlooked radar) weren't on patrol, instead they were doing ASW exercises. ASW was a valid mission and practice would be A Good Thing. Applying VP-21's numbers we get 51 planes required to do a 360° search to 450 miles so just 20 planes in the air could have done a search beyond the strike radius of any Japanese carrier based aircraft. Well, no. First off, setting up an air plan for surface search with multiple aircraft is a complex enterprise. The effective area of coverage for visual search is highly dependant upon environmental conditions. This does not mean you don't do it, only that it's not something you "just do." Second, the only air-surface detection system on any patrol aircraft at that time was the Mark I Eyeball. A fine device during daylight, but of limited utility at night or in less than fine VMC conditions. Since the Japanese force approached within strike range during the night then the only detection opportunities might have been at dusk the night before (but at the extreme range of the search) or at dawn as they were launching. Having spent a lot of hours doing open ocean visual search I can assure you that neither time is optimal. Third, your program would have been a MAXEFFORT thing. Sure it can be done, but it consumes aircraft and crews. So if you are going to run hard you must have something to run for. No one KNEW the location of the Japanese fleet. There was a bunch of speculation, but no one KNEW. Consuming your fuel and spares under those circumstances would not have been a wise military decision. With the aid of hindsight (which is always 20/20) a high intensity air plan starting on Friday, December 5, 1941 would have been a wise plan (even if it didn't work). But with the information at hand there was no justification for such an effort. Bill Kambic CDR, USNR(Ret) VS-27, VS-30, VS-73, VP 93, FASOTRAGRULANT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Remember Pearl Harbor: Special Program Tonight at EAA | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 0 | December 7th 04 07:40 PM |
Pearl Harbor Defense | Dave | Military Aviation | 157 | September 27th 04 12:43 AM |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |