A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LINCOLN



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 05, 05:39 PM
old hoodoo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The only problem with our smug reassurance that we have corrected the
"security" problem is that terrorists are very flexible. They aways
seem to attack in just the one area not thought about. You can reduce
the risk, but not the possibility.

Terrorists don't attack in order to reduce the size of the US navy. They
do it in with the intention of spreading out/wasting/diverting US
human and material resources and for the publicity. So, now, we expend
a lot more resources protecting ships worldwide when all the terrorists
have done is attack one US ship in a motorboat.

Yes our ships are protected, but in the long run, the attack on the Cole
was a terrorist victory on several fronts.

Of course one little victory doesn't win the war and it may actually
show how limited the terrorist resources are in which they have hundreds
of thousands of targets worldwide but can only successfully engage once
in a while. Maybe the world should not be in a such a panic all the
time, expending a lot of worry when the enemy is going to attack only
sporadically at a time and place of his choosing.

However, think of how little resources the terrorists have spent to
cause worldwide concern and how much we have spent to obtain an uneasy
"security".

I really hope that there is a secret war against terrorism going on, one
that we are winning that we don't know about.

The WTC fell, but the sky didn't...although sometimes I think everyone
thinks so.

Pechs1 wrote:

BC writes- The Lincoln looks like a setting duck over there, other than radar
and the
Cans what do they have going for them to prevent another USS Cole? Or is
that all they need? BRBR

I say-I'd be willing to bet the CO of any USN ship would rather stand before
the long green table for killing a few sightseers by mistake than have the USS
Cole happen to their ship.

If I saw a USN ship in ANY port in the world, I would not get into a boat to
'get a closer look'.
P. C. Chisholm
CDR, USN(ret.)
Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer


  #2  
Old January 15th 05, 09:15 PM
D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lincoln has now moved out to sea. The Indonesians would not let them
operate their jets within Indonesian territorial waters, so the ship moved
outside of them.

It's not easy to intercept a carrier at sea.



D

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More on Bush in the Air Guard WalterM140 Military Aviation 73 July 22nd 04 04:50 PM
The State of the Union: Lies about a Dishonest War RobbelothE Military Aviation 248 February 2nd 04 02:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.