A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Twenty Four Hour Spad Missions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old February 11th 05, 12:21 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . com,
writes:
The 1961 whale could indeed go out 2000 miles, drop an internally

carried payload of 12000 lbs and have enough fuel to return. This hop
would have to be unescorted by fighters or ECM birds.

This is a mission the navy gave up when they didn't continue
"first-day-of-war" stealth after the demise of the A-12. This kind of
mission now belongs soley to the Air Force.

I think the major change is that our CVG isn't tasked to seek out and

destroy the Soviet fleet.

Actually, Heavy Attack died with the end of the carriers' primary SIOP
mission in the '60s and the retirement of the A-3s. Although the
ostensibly heavy RA-5's retained the capability to drop nukes, the
problems with the linear bomb bay meant that they could only carry much
smaller weapons underwing.


That's not really the case - the A-5's internal bay could handle a
single Mk 27, B28, or B43 bomb, with all manner of problems that
go along with blowing off a piece of your airplane and blsating part
of its fuel system out of the back. (The bombs were part of a
bomb/tank "train". Firing the train out of the back required severing
fuel, pressure, and instrumentation lines, as well as the usual stuff
to get the bomb aremd and ready to go.
The pylons could handle B28, B43, or B57 bombs, with much better
release behavior. And you could carry 2 of them.
The RA-5 may well have been the only nuclear bomber to have had its
ability to deliver weapons improved by the elimination of the internal
bay. (Well, the F-105, maybe, as well)

By the mid '60s, though, the Powers That Be had realized that the RA-5
wa much more useful as a sensor platform. It could go places nobody
else could, and get data that nobody else could dig up.

--
Pete Stickney

Without data, all you have are opinions
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Longest War: Helicopter Missions, By Year Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 October 13th 04 05:18 AM
Russian recon planes fly ten missions over Baltics B2431 Military Aviation 4 March 2nd 04 04:44 AM
Aircraft per hour cost Fitzair4 Home Built 0 December 1st 03 02:15 PM
Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 30th 03 09:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.