cheap, durable, homebuilt aircrafts- myth or truth?

(Lou Parker) wrote:

This statement isn't exactly true. As per usual Bob didn't do his
homework.
======================================

wry smile

Isn't it ducky to know that Mr. Parker has the market
cornered on truth, justice and the American way?

Happy New year to all.....
even the petty malevolents that cannot resist one
last cheap at Unka BOb before the year closes out.
Surely, Lou is seen as a much bigger man for it.


Barnyard BOb --
The more people I meet,
the more I love my dog
and George Carlin humor.

okay...

before time runs out!

unka bob....your fat

there....with only 13 hours left!

I love ya unka bob!

take care

Blll

"RU ok" wrote in message
...


(Lou Parker) wrote:

This statement isn't exactly true. As per usual Bob didn't do his
homework.
======================================

wry smile

Isn't it ducky to know that Mr. Parker has the market
cornered on truth, justice and the American way?

He's right. Certified parts and keeping an aircraft certified requires
outrageous costs. But with an experimental you can still do it safely and
reasonably. And not get shaken down in the process. If I had to use a
Dukes or Weldon boost pump with my injected Continental, it would cost me at
least $800. I'll use one from the automotive suppliers, for $30 or so.
Mr. Parker is a ducky, and keen-thinking, sort of a guy.

And Mr. Bonomi is funny.


Happy New year to all.....
even the petty malevolents that cannot resist one
last cheap at Unka BOb before the year closes out.

Oh, you pooah, piddyfu' widdle avuncuwah, but hewwish monstah.

Surely, Lou is seen as a much bigger man for it.

Make you wezzowutions and twy to behave, cwusty ow' son of a succubus.



Barnyard Bum --

RU ok wrote:

Isn't it ducky to know that Mr. Parker has the market
cornered on truth, justice and the American way?

Begin Rant Mode

I marvel at how even the most carefully worded post, such as your
earlier post in this thread (replete with emphasized adjectives no
less), can attract the inevitable uselessnet nit-picker. In this
case, as is often the case, the nit-picker didn't actually refute what
you said but worded his post as a refutation anyway ("...not exactly
true... didn't do your homework"). Ironically, as is also often the
case, the nit-picker's post had more true nits than his target post.
Just another day in uselessnet.

End Rant Mode

Happy New year to all.....

Yes, happy new year!

David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com