A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » General Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

763 Cruising Speed.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 30th 04, 07:35 PM
Jeb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.


Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...


Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673


Whatever, 763 is how the aircraft is described in airline schedules.
Boeings are 7*7, the last 7 is redundant and replaced by the first
number of the variant.
  #2  
Old January 30th 04, 07:37 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeb" wrote in message
om...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message

...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.

Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...


Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673


Whatever, 763 is how the aircraft is described in airline schedules.
Boeings are 7*7, the last 7 is redundant and replaced by the first
number of the variant.


Everywhere outside this post I have seen the first 7 dropped. Perhaps you
are banging the bong a little hard?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. Doug Instrument Flight Rules 70 January 11th 04 08:35 PM
Jet fighter top speed at military power David L. Pulver Military Aviation 18 December 1st 03 07:13 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs Phil Carpenter Military Aviation 0 July 23rd 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.