![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Clonts" wrote in message om... Kyler, This is the input I got from J.G. on the OziUsers list, regarding the above: begin quote I took a look at the goetiff tags for the two images and I think I see the problem. The full image is specifying a key: ProjNatOriginLongGeoKey (Double,1): -100 While the smaller image does not even have that key. Somehow, the smaller image is using the tag: ProjFalseOriginLongGeoKey (Double,1): -100.583333 These can't both be right. I'd say the full image is the right one, since it loads fine in not just Ozi, but other programs too, while the smaller image does not work in other programs. I'm pretty certain that the ProjNatOriginLongGeoKey is only supposed to be used in cases where the prime meridian is not the familiar 0 degrees longitude value. Technically, the math may work, to subvert the function of that tag and then specify the ProjFalseOriginLongGeoKey as 0.0, but it's highly irregular. Listgeo is able to deal with it, by translating the natorigin key to it's equivalent falseorigin key, but programs generating geotiff files should not rely on geotiff readers to do this. All that said, you can fix these keys. If you redirect the output of the listgeo program to a file, you can edit that file with any ordinary text editor and reinstall it into the geotiff file, using the geotifcp program, which is part of the zip file I referred to previously. J.G. end quote Hello Kyler, FYI, I patched the tags in my test file (from https://aviationtoolbox.org/Members/...ul_Y=-676347.0) with geotifcp per J.G.'s instructions, and Oziexplorer is happy with that image now. Do you know if changing your generation code would be appropriate, and/or cause other problems with other software? Cheers, John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Clonts" writes:
FYI, I patched the tags in my test file (from https://aviationtoolbox.org/Members/...ul_Y=-676347.0) with geotifcp per J.G.'s instructions, and Oziexplorer is happy with that image now. Do you know if changing your generation code would be appropriate, and/or cause other problems with other software? It's appropriate and I want to do it. If it causes any problems, I'll work through them. I want these things to be correct. Yesterday I distilled the code to a few lines that demonstrate the problem and sent a report to the GDAL developer mailing list. http://remotesensing.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev/ It hasn't appeared in the archives yet. I welcome more reports to the list. My trivial example is below. Thank you. --kyler ================================================== ======================== #!/usr/bin/env python import gdal a = gdal.Open('a.tif') b = gdal.GetDriverByName('GTiff').Create( 'b.tif', a.RasterXSize, a.RasterYSize, 3, gdal.GDT_Byte, [ 'TILED=YES' ] ) b.SetProjection(a.GetProjection()) b.SetGeoTransform(a.GetGeoTransform()) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... "John Clonts" writes: FYI, I patched the tags in my test file (from https://aviationtoolbox.org/Members/...le=50&image_fo rmat=GeoTIFF&lr_Y=-753147.0&lr_X=318457.0&ul_X=216057.0&ul_Y=-676347.0) with geotifcp per J.G.'s instructions, and Oziexplorer is happy with that image now. Do you know if changing your generation code would be appropriate, and/or cause other problems with other software? It's appropriate and I want to do it. If it causes any problems, I'll work through them. I want these things to be correct. Yesterday I distilled the code to a few lines that demonstrate the problem and sent a report to the GDAL developer mailing list. http://remotesensing.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev/ It hasn't appeared in the archives yet. Hello Kyler, Well, I haven't seen your inquiry show up there yet-- nor at the nntp site news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel. But in the mean time I did some digging, and determined a fix that seems to work for it, in gdal-1.2.1\frmts\gtiff\gt_wkt_srs.cpp, line 1419: else if( EQUAL(pszProjection,SRS_PT_LAMBERT_CONFORMAL_CONIC _2SP) ) { GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, GTModelTypeGeoKey, TYPE_SHORT, 1, ModelTypeProjected); GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjectedCSTypeGeoKey, TYPE_SHORT, 1, KvUserDefined ); GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjectionGeoKey, TYPE_SHORT, 1, KvUserDefined ); GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjCoordTransGeoKey, TYPE_SHORT, 1, CT_LambertConfConic_2SP ); GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjFalseOriginLatGeoKey, TYPE_DOUBLE, 1, poSRS-GetProjParm( SRS_PP_LATITUDE_OF_ORIGIN, 0.0 ) ); /* jcc 7/2/04 changed from ProjFalseOriginLongGeoKey */ GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjNatOriginLongGeoKey, TYPE_DOUBLE, 1, // line 1419 poSRS-GetProjParm( SRS_PP_CENTRAL_MERIDIAN, 0.0 ) ); GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjStdParallel1GeoKey, TYPE_DOUBLE, 1, poSRS-GetProjParm( SRS_PP_STANDARD_PARALLEL_1, 0.0 ) ); I tried to post to the nntp server on the devel list but it did not accept my posting... perhaps you have better connections into that group. I will post my new pymod\_gdal.dll and bin\gdal12.dll on alt.binaries.pictures.aviation if you would like to test them... Cheers, John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Clonts" writes:
/* jcc 7/2/04 changed from ProjFalseOriginLongGeoKey */ GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjNatOriginLongGeoKey, TYPE_DOUBLE, 1, // I had considered doing that too. I hesitated because I just don't know enough about it. If it works for you, however, I'm happy to do it. Please try the GeoTIFFs now. Do they work the way you expect? If not, please take a look at the TIFFs in these directories. http://aviationtoolbox.org/munge/data/masked/ http://aviationtoolbox.org/munge/data/warped/ I'm regenerating the whole set with the modified GDAL. Thank you! --kyler |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... "John Clonts" writes: /* jcc 7/2/04 changed from ProjFalseOriginLongGeoKey */ GTIFKeySet(psGTIF, ProjNatOriginLongGeoKey, TYPE_DOUBLE, 1, // I had considered doing that too. I hesitated because I just don't know enough about it. If it works for you, however, I'm happy to do it. Well, you probably know more about it than I do-- I hope it doesn't screw somebody else up ![]() until next week Please try the GeoTIFFs now. Do they work the way you expect? It works the same as before, and I see that it still has the "FalseOrigin" instead of the "NatOrigin" key. (I.e. from https://aviationtoolbox.org/Members/...s/map_explorer). If not, please take a look at the TIFFs in these directories. http://aviationtoolbox.org/munge/data/masked/ http://aviationtoolbox.org/munge/data/warped/ Ok, but these are 200Mb files? I'm regenerating the whole set with the modified GDAL. Thank you! Thank you! John |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've completely regenerated all of the images from the base (FAA) set
using the modifified GDAL. Please verify that the GeoTIFFs are now as they need to be. https://aviationtoolbox.org/Members/...s/map_explorer I now see tags such as this. ProjNatOriginLongGeoKey (Double,1): -100.583333 Thank you. --kyler |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... I've completely regenerated all of the images from the base (FAA) set using the modifified GDAL. Please verify that the GeoTIFFs are now as they need to be. https://aviationtoolbox.org/Members/...s/map_explorer I now see tags such as this. ProjNatOriginLongGeoKey (Double,1): -100.583333 Thank you. --kyler\ Seems to work perfectly for me now... Thank you!! John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|